How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Kővári–Sós–Turán common-neighbour count and the discrete convexity lower bound for degree sums
Statement
Let be integers, let be bipartite with parts , where , , and let . If contains no oriented with vertices in , then
For and any nonnegative integers with sum , moving one unit from a value at least two larger than another cannot increase . Consequently the minimum occurs when the values differ by at most one. If , this gives
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.
In , the -vertex part of the forbidden lies on the left and the -vertex part lies on the right (The Zarankiewicz number for a forbidden in a bipartite graph).
The open neighbourhood is and (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).
For a finite incidence relation, the sum of its row-fibre sizes equals the sum of its column-fibre sizes (Double counting: for a relation between finite sets).
is the number of -element subsets of an -element set (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient ).
Proof
Count pairs with , , and . Counting first by gives the left side. For fixed , at most vertices of contain in their neighbourhood, or those vertices with form the forbidden . Counting first by proves the upper bound.
Partitioning the -subsets of a -element set according to whether they contain one distinguished element gives , a nondecreasing function of . Thus if , replacing by does not increase the binomial sum. Repetition terminates at values and .
For integers , . Writing with , the balanced sum is the corresponding linear interpolation between and ; convexity of on nonnegative reals bounds it below by .
Steps 1.1-2.1 prove the common-neighbour upper count and the discrete smoothing lower count with the stated threshold.
Depends on
- The Zarankiewicz number $z(m,n;s,t)$ for a forbidden $K_{s,t}$ in a bipartite graph
- Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree
- Double counting: $\sum_{x \in X}\lvert R_x\rvert = \lvert R\rvert = \sum_{y \in Y}\lvert R^y\rvert$ for a relation between finite sets
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 57 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yufei Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics (standard reference, not scraped)