Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Kővári–Sós–Turán common-neighbour count and the discrete convexity lower bound for degree sums

Statement

Let s,t≥1 be integers, let G be bipartite with parts A,B, where ∣A∣=m, ∣B∣=n, and let d(b)=∣N(b)∩A∣. If G contains no oriented Ks,t with s vertices in A, then

∑b∈B(d(b)s)≤(t−1)(ms).

For n≥1 and any nonnegative integers d1,…,dn with sum E, moving one unit from a value at least two larger than another cannot increase ∑i(dis). Consequently the minimum occurs when the values differ by at most one. If E/n≥s−1, this gives

∑i=1n(dis)≥ns!(En−s+1)s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.

[F1]

In z(m,n;s,t), the s-vertex part of the forbidden Ks,t lies on the left and the t-vertex part lies on the right (The Zarankiewicz number z(m,n;s,t) for a forbidden Ks,t in a bipartite graph).

[F2]

The open neighbourhood is NG(v)={u:{u,v}∈E} and deg⁡G(v)=∣NG(v)∣ (Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).

[F3]

For a finite incidence relation, the sum of its row-fibre sizes equals the sum of its column-fibre sizes (Double counting: ∑x∈X∣Rx∣=∣R∣=∑y∈Y∣Ry∣ for a relation between finite sets).

[F4]

(nk) is the number of k-element subsets of an n-element set (The set [A]k of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient (nk):=∣[n]k∣).

Proof

technique · double-count common neighbours, then smooth integer degrees
1.1

Count pairs (S,b) with S⊆A, ∣S∣=s, and S⊆N(b). Counting first by b gives the left side. For fixed S, at most t−1 vertices of B contain S in their neighbourhood, or those vertices with S form the forbidden Ks,t. Counting first by S proves the upper bound.

givenF1F2F3
1.2

Partitioning the s-subsets of a d-element set according to whether they contain one distinguished element gives (ds)−(d−1s)=(d−1s−1), a nondecreasing function of d. Thus if di≥dj+2, replacing (di,dj) by (di−1,dj+1) does not increase the binomial sum. Repetition terminates at values q=⌊E/n⌋ and q+1.

givenF4
2.1

For integers d≥s−1, (ds)≥(d−s+1)s/s!. Writing E/n=q+θ with 0≤θ<1, the balanced sum is the corresponding linear interpolation between (qs) and (q+1s); convexity of y↦ys on nonnegative reals bounds it below by n(E/n−s+1)s/s!.

step 1.2algebraF4
3.1

Steps 1.1-2.1 prove the common-neighbour upper count and the discrete smoothing lower count with the stated threshold.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources