Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lifting residue frobenius by galois conjugates

Statement

Let L/K be finite Galois and P∣p nonzero primes. Put q=∣κ(p)∣. Some σ∈D(P/p) induces the arithmetic power map x↦xq on κ(P).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

Inertia group of a prime: For finite Galois L/K and a chosen nonzero prime P∣p, set κ(P)=OL/P and κ(p)=OK/p. Each σ∈D(P/p) induces a κ(p)-automorphism σˉ of κ(P): the rule aˉ↦σa‾ is independent of the representative because σP=P. The inertia group is I(P/p)=ker⁡ ⁣(D(P/p)⟶Gal⁡(κ(P)/κ(p))). Equivalently, σ∈I(P/p) exactly when σ∈D(P/p) and σ(a)−a∈P for every a∈OL. It is a normal subgroup of D.

[F2]

Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals: Let R be a commutative ring and let I1,…,Ir be pairwise comaximal ideals, where r≥1. Then the canonical map R⟶∏i=1rR/Ii,x⟼(x+I1,…,x+Ir) is surjective, its kernel is ⋂i=1rIi, and ⋂i=1rIi=∏i=1rIi. Equivalently, R/∏i=1rIi≅∏i=1rR/Ii.

[F3]

The multiplicative group Fq× of a finite field is cyclic: The multiplicative group F×=F∖{0} of every finite field F is cyclic.

Proof

1.1F2F3

Choose a generator u of the finite cyclic group κ(P)×. CRT gives α∈OL reducing to u at P and to zero at every other prime above p. This also works when κ(P)=F2, with u=1, or when P is the only prime.

2.1step 1.1

The orbit polynomial H(T)=∏τ∈G(T−τα) has integral G-invariant coefficients, hence belongs to OK[T]. Its reduction has coefficients in κ(p), so H(uq)=H(u)q=0 in κ(P). Its displayed linear factorization implies uq=σα‾ for some σ∈G.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1∎

If σ−1P≠P, alpha is zero at σ−1P, giving σα‾=0, contrary to uq≠0. Thus σ∈D. On every nonzero residue uj it acts by (uq)j=(uj)q; it fixes zero as well. This is the asserted residue action.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources