Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lifting residue frobenius by galois conjugates

Statement

Let L/K be finite Galois and Pp nonzero primes. Put q=κ(p). Some σD(P/p) induces the arithmetic power map xxq on κ(P).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

Inertia group of a prime: For finite Galois L/K and a chosen nonzero prime Pp, set κ(P)=OL/P and κ(p)=OK/p. Each σD(P/p) induces a κ(p)-automorphism σˉ of κ(P): the rule aˉσa is independent of the representative because σP=P. The inertia group is I(P/p)=ker ⁣(D(P/p)Gal(κ(P)/κ(p))). Equivalently, σI(P/p) exactly when σD(P/p) and σ(a)aP for every aOL. It is a normal subgroup of D.

[F2]

Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals: Let R be a commutative ring and let I1,,Ir be pairwise comaximal ideals, where r1. Then the canonical map Ri=1rR/Ii,x(x+I1,,x+Ir) is surjective, its kernel is i=1rIi, and i=1rIi=i=1rIi. Equivalently, R/i=1rIii=1rR/Ii.

[F3]

The multiplicative group Fq× of a finite field is cyclic: The multiplicative group F×=F{0} of every finite field F is cyclic.

Proof

1.1

Choose a generator u of the finite cyclic group κ(P)×. CRT gives αOL reducing to u at P and to zero at every other prime above p. This also works when κ(P)=F2, with u=1, or when P is the only prime.

F2F3
2.1

The orbit polynomial H(T)=τG(Tτα) has integral G-invariant coefficients, hence belongs to OK[T]. Its reduction has coefficients in κ(p), so H(uq)=H(u)q=0 in κ(P). Its displayed linear factorization implies uq=σα for some σG.

step 1.1
3.1

If σ1PP, alpha is zero at σ1P, giving σα=0, contrary to uq0. Thus σD. On every nonzero residue uj it acts by (uq)j=(uj)q; it fixes zero as well. This is the asserted residue action.

F1step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources