Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Diagram word for a preferred peripheral longitude

Statement

Let the diagram be either a based regular string-link diagram in D2×[0,1] or a finite regular oriented diagram of a nonempty labeled closed link. In either mode write its labeled components as K1,…,Kr, where r is positive. In closed-link mode, choose pairwise-disjoint closed product tubes N(Ki), let EL=S3∖int⁡(⋃iN(Ki)) be their compact exterior, and choose the positive meridian circles on their boundaries; these tube and peripheral choices are part of the input. In string-link mode, choose the product-tube parallel to be the blackboard push-off determined by the projected tangent, carried through the fixed endpoint collars. Choose one initial strand on each component. Let xe denote the compatible based positive meridian of strand e, and let xj be the meridian on the chosen initial strand of component Kj. For the literal diagram word below first use compatible common-upper-collar accesses to all positive strand meridians and the induced endpoint accesses for the parallel; a common change of the complement base path is allowed. Arbitrary independent access paths and other degree-one parallels remain allowed, with their exact correction formula specified below. Traverse component Kj in its orientation (from bottom to top for a string link and once around for a closed link). At each undercrossing c of Kj, let o(c) be the over-strand, and set ϵc=+1 if the traversal goes from the source side to the target side of the over-strand's positive in-plane normal, and ϵc=−1 if it goes from target to source. If the undercrossings in traversal order are c1,…,cs, define Wj(D)=xo(c1)ϵc1⋯xo(cs)ϵcs. For a string link, this word represents its based longitude. For a closed link, it represents the blackboard parallel in π1(EL). The preferred zero-self-meridian longitude in the closed-link case is represented by λj(D)=xj−wr⁡j(D)Wj(D), where xj is the initial meridian on Kj and wr⁡j(D) is the sum of crossing signs at self-crossings of Kj.

For the arbitrary-choice branch, write ae for the compatible access to the chosen meridian circle of strand e and ae′ for the actual access, after recording any endpoint-on-the-circle connectors. Put ge=ae′ae−1 and ye=gexege−1. The compatible word expressed in these actual meridians is W^j=∏c in traversal ordergo(c)−1yo(c)ϵcgo(c)=Wj. Let a0,a1 be the compatible accesses to the initial and terminal points of the blackboard parallel, with the fixed side connector included in a1 for a string link. For a closed component these are the same access. Record actual accesses a0′,a1′ and put h0=a0′a0−1, h1=a1′a1−1. For a chosen parallel β′ with the same endpoint coordinates as the blackboard parallel β, let k∈Z be its relative meridian winding, so β′≃μ0kβ on the tube. A closed degree-one parallel is included; then h0=h1=h. Its actual based class is exactly h0xjkW^jh1−1. For a closed component its self-meridian coordinate is k+wr⁡j(D), and its preferred zero-self-meridian correction is h xj−wr⁡j(D)W^j h−1. Thus arbitrary changes are retained as explicit transport and winding factors; independent access choices are not silently assumed to give the literal uncorrected product in the ye.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The diagram, based strand meridians, base arcs, and product tubes in the statement.

[F1]

At each crossing, based positive meridians on the source and target under-sides satisfy the side-based conjugation relation. Local meridian conjugacy at a labeled link crossing

[F2]

In the meridian basis of [F3], the class of a word is its vector of meridian exponent sums. Positive arc meridians on the same component differ by tube transport and conjugation, hence have the same homology class. The choice-free first Hurewicz theorem identifies loop concatenation with addition in H1 and kills conjugation. The first Hurewicz map is abelianization No crossing-count theorem with an additional choice hypothesis is needed.

[F3]

The positive component meridians form a basis of exterior H1, and the degree-one class with zero self-meridian coordinate is the preferred closed-link longitude class. String-link exterior homology and end-meridian maps, Based string links and labeled link peripheral systems

[F4]

The crossing sign is the determinant sign of the ordered over- and under-tangents in the oriented projection plane. Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing

Proof

1.1F1giveninductionalgebra

Set v0=1. Suppose the current strand meridian on Kj is represented by vi−1−1xjvi−1. At crossing ci, if the component passes source-to-target, [F1] replaces it by xo(ci)−1vi−1−1xjvi−1xo(ci), which is vi−1xjvi for vi=vi−1xo(ci). If it passes target-to-source, solving the same relation for the source meridian gives the same formula with vi=vi−1xo(ci)−1. Thus after one traversal the ordered product is exactly Wj(D).

2.1F1step 1.1construct

In the local product chart at each undercrossing, the narrow band between the component and its parallel has boundary access paths whose difference is the over-meridian factor just computed in step 1.1. Away from crossings the parallel and the core run in a product annulus and contribute no group letter. Concatenating these finitely many local annuli from bottom to top gives the based string-link longitude; concatenating once around a closed component gives its based blackboard-parallel loop. In both cases the ordered word is Wj(D).

3.1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra

In the closed-link case the parallel in step 2.1 has degree +1 on Kj. By [F2] and [F3], its self-meridian coordinate is the exponent sum of those factors in Wj(D) whose over-strand belongs to Kj. Each self-crossing contributes exactly once, at its underpass. Source-to-target means the under-tangent has positive determinant with the over-tangent, so its exponent is the crossing sign +1; target-to-source gives both signs −1 by [F4]. Consequently the coordinate is exactly wr⁡j(D). Every mixed-crossing factor lies in a different meridian coordinate and contributes zero to this coordinate. This proves the needed self-writhe correction directly from the actual group word and homology basis, without invoking a countable-choice framing or linking-number theorem.

3.2givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra

For arbitrary strand accesses, path concatenation gives ye=gexege−1 and hence xeϵ=ge−1yeϵge for ϵ=±1. Substitution in the finite ordered product proves W^j=Wj exactly, without asserting that independent meridian conjugations cancel. A common base-path change conjugates every factor and the entire word by that one path, recovering the literal-word branch with its correspondingly based meridians.

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra

In the closed-link case, multiplication by xj−wr⁡j(D) changes the self-meridian coordinate by −wr⁡j(D) and leaves the degree on Kj equal to +1. Its self-meridian coordinate is therefore zero. By [F3], this is the preferred zero-self-meridian longitude class. In the string-link case, step 2.1 already gives the based longitude specified by the tube and access paths.

5.1F3givenstep 3.1step 4.1step 3.2constructalgebra∎

The tube annulus of a string component is [0,1]×S1. Two paths between its fixed endpoint coordinates differ, relative endpoints, by the integer winding of their concatenation in S1: lift that coordinate to R and linearly interpolate paths with the same lifted endpoints. Thus β′≃μ0kβ. On a closed component the same calculation on S1×S1 gives the unique class (k,1) of a degree-one parallel relative to the blackboard section; its based loop is μ0kβ. Concatenating actual accesses now gives a0′β′(a1′)−1=h0(a0μ0ka0−1)(a0βa1−1)h1−1=h0xjkW^jh1−1. For a closed component h0=h1=h and conjugation changes no homology coordinate. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 give coordinate k+wr⁡j(D). Multiplication by the actual initial meridian (hxjh−1)−(k+wr⁡j(D)) cancels both the chosen extra winding and the self-writhe, leaving hxj−wr⁡j(D)W^jh−1. It has degree one and zero self-coordinate, so [F3] identifies precisely the preferred class. These formulas cover no undercrossings, k=0, independently changed endpoints, and common conjugation, and preserve the arbitrary data of the peripheral definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources