How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Decay of a localized measure on a curved graph patch
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , let be open, , , let carry the graph surface measure , and put (the localization of by the pullback of ). If on , then for all , with depending on . More generally, if is a smooth hypersurface and for whose restriction to has compact support in , with the Gaussian curvature of nonvanishing on , then the same decay holds.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graph, amplitude, nondegenerate Hessian on its compact support, and Countable Choice in the statement.
Nonstationary phase gives arbitrary inverse powers of the parameter; near one nondegenerate stationary point stationary phase gives the power , with constants controlled by finite derivative bounds, inverse Hessian bounds and the gradient away from the point. (Stationary phase with a compactly supported amplitude)
Smooth inverse/implicit bootstrap, graph charts and compactly supported finite localization follow from earlier Euclidean calculus. (Smooth Euclidean hypersurface graphs and compact localization)
Graph Hessian nondegeneracy is equivalent to nonvanishing extrinsic Gaussian curvature, independent of local normal orientation. (Shape operator and Gauss-Kronecker curvature of a graph, Euclidean hypersurface normals, shape operators and curvature)
Smooth cutoffs, compactness and graph surface density are available. (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs, For a nonempty subset of with , compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent, Chart and partition independence of surface measure)
Countable Choice is assumed. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Proof
Put , and . Choose a compact neighbourhood of inside on which is invertible. This exists by continuity and a finite cover of . Every derivative of needed below is bounded there. For , and , the phase is and the integral is . Its gradient is . At a zero in , , so the Hessian is invertible with uniformly bounded inverse.
Fix a direction . Its zeros in are isolated by the inverse theorem in [F2]. Only finitely many lie in a smaller compact neighbourhood of : otherwise compactness gives an accumulating zero in , contradicting local invertibility. Surround these finitely many zeros by disjoint small balls compactly contained in , on which is injective; choose smaller concentric balls around the zeros. Every remaining point of has nonzero phase gradient at . A fixed finite smooth partition on a neighbourhood of therefore splits into amplitudes supported either in these zero balls or on a compact set where .
Shrink a neighbourhood of in the direction sphere. On the nonstationary support, continuity keeps the gradient at least . For each zero ball, the implicit theorem provides a smooth critical point remaining in its smaller ball for . Injectivity of and ensure it is the only critical point in the larger ball. By shrinking the ball and , Taylor's formula makes near that point uniformly: subtract the gradient at and use uniform closeness of the Hessian to its invertible value at . On the compact remainder of the ball the gradient stays bounded below after further shrinking . All required derivatives and Hessian inverses are uniformly bounded.
Apply [F1] on these supports. The nonstationary amplitudes give uniformly on . The zero-ball amplitudes give uniformly, even when the critical point lies outside the amplitude support: add a fixed smooth bump supported in that ball, equal to one on its smaller ball and multiplied by a constant larger than the amplitude bound, then subtract the same bump. Each of the two new amplitudes has the critical point in the interior of its support and uniformly bounded derivatives, so the stated stationary estimate applies to each; the local proof uses only the phase on that ball. Thus the original amplitude has the same bound by subtraction. This also handles critical points entering or leaving the original support.
The neighbourhoods constructed for each direction cover the compact sphere, so finitely many suffice. Taking the maximum of their finite constants gives for . For every , the pointwise estimate follows from unit modulus of the exponential and bounded compact support. Combining the two bounds yields after increasing . No constancy of the number of critical points over the whole sphere is asserted or used.
For the general clause, is compact by the explicit hypothesis. Apply [F2] to , and [F3] to its graph charts; shrink the charts to retain nondegenerate Hessians on the compact supports of the localized weights. The graph amplitudes are smooth and compactly supported in their parameter domains. The graph measure formula in [F4] writes as their finite sum. A rigid motion rotates the frequency and contributes only a scalar exponential of modulus one, so step 5.1 applies without changing . Summing proves the asserted general decay.
Depends on
- Stationary phase with a compactly supported amplitude
- Shape operator and Gauss-Kronecker curvature of a graph
- Smooth Euclidean hypersurface graphs and compact localization
- Euclidean hypersurface normals, shape operators and curvature
- Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs
- For a nonempty subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with $n\ge1$, compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- Chart and partition independence of surface measure
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Williams, Notes on harmonic analysis (standard reference, not scraped)