Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Decay of a localized measure on a curved graph patch

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥2, let U⊆Rn−1 be open, h∈C∞(U), a∈Cc∞(U), let S=graph⁡h carry the graph surface measure σ, and put dμ:=a(y)1+∣∇h(y)∣2 dy (the localization of σ by the pullback of a). If det⁡D2h≠0 on supp⁡a, then ∣μˇ(x)∣=∣∫e2πi(x′⋅y+xnh(y))a(y)1+∣∇h(y)∣2 dy∣≤Ca(1+∣x∣)−(n−1)/2 for all x=(x′,xn)∈Rn, with Ca depending on a,h,n. More generally, if S is a smooth hypersurface and μ=φσ for φ∈Cc∞(Rn) whose restriction to S has compact support in S, with the Gaussian curvature of S nonvanishing on S∩supp⁡φ, then the same decay holds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The graph, amplitude, nondegenerate Hessian on its compact support, and Countable Choice in the statement.

[F1]

Nonstationary phase gives arbitrary inverse powers of the parameter; near one nondegenerate stationary point stationary phase gives the power −(n−1)/2, with constants controlled by finite derivative bounds, inverse Hessian bounds and the gradient away from the point. (Stationary phase with a compactly supported amplitude)

[F2]

Smooth inverse/implicit bootstrap, graph charts and compactly supported finite localization follow from earlier Euclidean calculus. (Smooth Euclidean hypersurface graphs and compact localization)

[F3]

Graph Hessian nondegeneracy is equivalent to nonvanishing extrinsic Gaussian curvature, independent of local normal orientation. (Shape operator and Gauss-Kronecker curvature of a graph, Euclidean hypersurface normals, shape operators and curvature)

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

technique · direct; use finitely many neighbourhoods of directions and retain stationary points in slightly enlarged spatial patches
1.1givenF3F4algebra

Put d=n−1, b=a1+∣∇h∣2 and K=supp⁡a. Choose a compact neighbourhood K+ of K inside U on which D2h is invertible. This exists by continuity and a finite cover of K. Every derivative of h needed below is bounded there. For x=ρω, ρ≥1 and ω∈Sn−1, the phase is ψω(y)=ω′⋅y+ωnh(y) and the integral is ∫e2πiρψωb. Its gradient is ω′+ωn∇h. At a zero in K+, ∣ωn∣=(1+∣∇h∣2)−1/2, so the Hessian ωnD2h is invertible with uniformly bounded inverse.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

Fix a direction ω0. Its zeros in K+ are isolated by the inverse theorem in [F2]. Only finitely many lie in a smaller compact neighbourhood of K: otherwise compactness gives an accumulating zero in K+, contradicting local invertibility. Surround these finitely many zeros by disjoint small balls compactly contained in K+, on which ∇h is injective; choose smaller concentric balls around the zeros. Every remaining point of K has nonzero phase gradient at ω0. A fixed finite smooth partition on a neighbourhood of K therefore splits b into amplitudes supported either in these zero balls or on a compact set where ∣∇ψω0∣≥c>0.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Shrink a neighbourhood V of ω0 in the direction sphere. On the nonstationary support, continuity keeps the gradient at least c/2. For each zero ball, the implicit theorem provides a smooth critical point z(ω) remaining in its smaller ball for ω∈V. Injectivity of ∇h and ωn≠0 ensure it is the only critical point in the larger ball. By shrinking the ball and V, Taylor's formula makes ∣∇ψω(y)∣≥c0∣y−z(ω)∣ near that point uniformly: subtract the gradient at z and use uniform closeness of the Hessian to its invertible value at (ω0,z(ω0)). On the compact remainder of the ball the gradient stays bounded below after further shrinking V. All required derivatives and Hessian inverses are uniformly bounded.

4.1F1F4step 3.1algebra

Apply [F1] on these supports. The nonstationary amplitudes give O(ρ−N) uniformly on V. The zero-ball amplitudes give O(ρ−d/2) uniformly, even when the critical point lies outside the amplitude support: add a fixed smooth bump supported in that ball, equal to one on its smaller ball and multiplied by a constant larger than the amplitude bound, then subtract the same bump. Each of the two new amplitudes has the critical point in the interior of its support and uniformly bounded derivatives, so the stated stationary estimate applies to each; the local proof uses only the phase on that ball. Thus the original amplitude has the same bound by subtraction. This also handles critical points entering or leaving the original support.

5.1F4step 1.1step 4.1algebra

The neighbourhoods V constructed for each direction cover the compact sphere, so finitely many suffice. Taking the maximum of their finite constants gives ∣μˇ(x)∣≤C∣x∣−d/2 for ∣x∣≥1. For every x, the pointwise estimate ∣μˇ(x)∣≤∫∣b(y)∣dy<∞ follows from unit modulus of the exponential and bounded compact support. Combining the two bounds yields Ca(1+∣x∣)−d/2 after increasing Ca. No constancy of the number of critical points over the whole sphere is asserted or used.

6.1F2F3F4A1step 5.1∎

For the general clause, K=supp⁡S(φ∣S) is compact by the explicit hypothesis. Apply [F2] to K, and [F3] to its graph charts; shrink the charts to retain nondegenerate Hessians on the compact supports of the localized weights. The graph amplitudes aj=(χjφ)∘Xj are smooth and compactly supported in their parameter domains. The graph measure formula in [F4] writes φσ as their finite sum. A rigid motion rotates the frequency and contributes only a scalar exponential of modulus one, so step 5.1 applies without changing ∣x∣. Summing proves the asserted general decay.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources