Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Distinct-phrase count and Ziv inequality

Statement

For any distinct finite parsing over a finite alphabet and any order-k Markov kernel, proves the finite-block likelihood inequality grouped by phrase length and preceding context.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite word y0m−1 over a finite alphabet B, any parsing y1,…,yN into distinct nonempty phrases, and a fixed context s∈Bk. The empty word may have the empty parsing. In the LZ78 specialization, include the terminator in B. An order-k Markov kernel consists of probability rows Q(⋅∣u) on B for every u∈Bk; Q(y∣u) denotes the product of its successive row probabilities while reading y from context u and updating the context with each symbol.

[F1]

Losslessness and prefix property of the explicit LZ78 code: ordinary complete LZ78 phrases are distinct, and the terminal phrase contains the unique marker.

[F2]

Finite-block information and entropy in bits: finite words have ordinary finite-alphabet probability laws.

Proof

Given: The distinct parsing, order-k kernel and fixed initial context.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

For each phrase start i, let ui∈Bk be its preceding context, using s for the initial boundary; write ℓi=∣yi∣. For each pair (ℓ,u) let cℓ,u count phrases of that length and context. Markov factorization gives Q(y0m−1∣s)=∏iQ(yi∣ui).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Group the logarithm by (ℓ,u) with cℓ,u>0; groups of count zero contribute zero. Concavity of log⁡2 gives ∑i:(ℓi,ui)=(ℓ,u)log⁡2Q(yi∣u)≤cℓ,ulog⁡2(1cℓ,u∑iQ(yi∣u)). Within this group the phrase strings are distinct by the given parsing hypothesis (supplied by [F1] for the LZ78 specialization), so their conditional probabilities sum to at most one; therefore the group contribution is at most −cℓ,ulog⁡2cℓ,u.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Summing all groups and negating yields the Ziv inequality −log⁡2Q(y0m−1∣s)≥∑ℓ,ucℓ,ulog⁡2cℓ,u. For the augmented LZ78 specialization, the terminal phrase has the unique symbol # and cannot equal any ordinary phrase; [F1] supplies distinctness of the remaining phrases. For the empty parsing, both sides are zero. Zero kernel probabilities on an observed word make the left side +∞, and the inequality is then immediate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources