How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distinct-phrase count and Ziv inequality
Statement
For any distinct finite parsing over a finite alphabet and any order-k Markov kernel, proves the finite-block likelihood inequality grouped by phrase length and preceding context.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite word over a finite alphabet , any parsing into distinct nonempty phrases, and a fixed context . The empty word may have the empty parsing. In the LZ78 specialization, include the terminator in . An order- Markov kernel consists of probability rows on for every ; denotes the product of its successive row probabilities while reading from context and updating the context with each symbol.
Losslessness and prefix property of the explicit LZ78 code: ordinary complete LZ78 phrases are distinct, and the terminal phrase contains the unique marker.
Finite-block information and entropy in bits: finite words have ordinary finite-alphabet probability laws.
Proof
Given: The distinct parsing, order- kernel and fixed initial context.
For each phrase start , let be its preceding context, using for the initial boundary; write . For each pair let count phrases of that length and context. Markov factorization gives .
Group the logarithm by with ; groups of count zero contribute zero. Concavity of gives Within this group the phrase strings are distinct by the given parsing hypothesis (supplied by [F1] for the LZ78 specialization), so their conditional probabilities sum to at most one; therefore the group contribution is at most .
Summing all groups and negating yields the Ziv inequality For the augmented LZ78 specialization, the terminal phrase has the unique symbol and cannot equal any ordinary phrase; [F1] supplies distinctness of the remaining phrases. For the empty parsing, both sides are zero. Zero kernel probabilities on an observed word make the left side , and the inequality is then immediate.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stanford EE376C, Lempel-Ziv Compression lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)