How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
AEP criterion for fixed-rate lossless coding
Statement
For any finite-alphabet source with -n^{-1}log2 P(X^n) converging in probability to h, proves vanishing block error is achievable for R>h and impossible for R<h.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite block laws on , entropy-rate candidate , a target rate , and normalized self-information from Finite-block information and entropy in bits. Assume in probability.
Finite-block information and entropy in bits: on positive-probability blocks.
Fixed-length lossless block codes and error probability: a rate- code has message set , encoder , decoder , and injective on its success set.
Proof
Given: The AEP convergence and finite-block coding convention [F1]–[F2].
If , then the nonnegative variable stays at distance at least from , contradicting convergence in probability; hence . Let and choose with . Define . On , each word has probability at least , so . The AEP gives .
For all sufficiently large , , since . Fix an enumeration of the finite alphabet once, and let be its first symbol. For each such , order lexicographically, take in lexicographic order, and map the th typical block to the th binary word. Define by this assignment on and by otherwise. Define to return each typical block on its assigned message and on all remaining messages. This is a rate- code in the sense of [F2], and every block in is decoded correctly. Its error is at most . For the finitely many earlier , take constant at the all-zero message and constant at .
Let and choose with . For any rate- code, its success set has at most words by [F2]. Split it according to whether . The probability of successful words in that part is at most , while the other part has total probability tending to zero by the AEP. Thus success probability tends to zero. At neither conclusion is asserted.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)