How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fixed-rate lossless coding for AMS ergodic sources
Statement
Assume AC. For a finite-alphabet AMS source with ergodic stationary mean, fixed-rate lossless coding has vanishing block error above the stationary-mean entropy rate and success probability tending to zero below it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a finite-alphabet AMS source with ergodic stationary mean and entropy rate ; and a target rate with the fixed-length code convention of Fixed-length lossless block codes and error probability.
The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited only through the AMS information-AEP tail-domination prerequisite.
Shannon–McMillan limit for finite-alphabet AMS ergodic sources: normalized self-information under the AMS block law converges almost surely, hence in probability, to .
AEP criterion for fixed-rate lossless coding: an information AEP gives the fixed-rate achievability and converse.
Dominated convergence: bounded almost-surely convergent indicators converge in expectation.
Proof
Given: AC and the source and hypotheses above.
Almost-sure convergence in [F1] implies convergence in probability by [F3] applied to the bounded deviation indicators.
Apply [F2]. Every rate admits fixed-length codes with block error tending to zero, and for every every fixed-length code sequence has success probability tending to zero. This conclusion concerns the AMS source law; no stationarity assumption on that law is added.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul H. Algoet and Thomas M. Cover, “A Sandwich Proof of the Shannon–McMillan–Breiman Theorem,” Annals of Probability 16 (1988), 899–909 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert M. Gray, Entropy and Information Theory, corrected edition (standard reference, not scraped)