How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stationary-ergodic LZ77 phrase-length theorem
Statement
For a stationary ergodic finite-alphabet source with bit entropy rate , define using LZ77 previous-match length and recurrence time. Then in probability. If , the inverse window length satisfies in probability as integer .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A stationary ergodic finite-alphabet source with bit entropy rate , the recurrence distance and inverse window phrase length of LZ77 previous-match length and recurrence time.
Ergodic Shannon–McMillan–Breiman theorem: almost surely.
Kac return-time formula without invertibility: for a positive-measure set in an ergodic probability-preserving system, the integral over of its first positive return time is .
Conditional block information rate given the infinite past: almost surely, with finite-past conditional averages defining the displayed versions.
LZ77 previous-match length and recurrence time: and , with maximum if unbounded; the empty match is allowed.
Proof
Given: The source, entropy rate and definitions above.
Fix and put . By [F1], the current block belongs to with probability tending to one, and because its word probabilities sum to at most one. For , let . On , is the first positive return to under the inverse shift, which is also measure-preserving and ergodic. Hence [F2] gives . On , for , so integrating and using [F2] yields . Summing over and adding the atypical-block probability proves .
Suppose and choose . Fix a past and a current word . Write for their concatenation on coordinates and ; every coordinate used in a match of the current block at positive offset lies in this range. For any fixed offset , the match equations determine at most one word : for the right side is fixed by the past, and for it equals the already determined letter . Therefore at most words have for any positive integer .
Put and, for each past , let . By [F3], the actual block lies outside with probability tending to zero. For fixed , let be the words whose recurrence offset is at most ; step 1.2 gives . Splitting its conditional mass into and its complement gives The first term is at most , and the integral of the second term over pasts is exactly by the conditional-law property in [F3]. Therefore , so the lower tail below vanishes.
If , the lower tail below is impossible because . If , step 2.1 handles , while larger lower-tail thresholds are also impossible. Together with step 1.1 this proves in probability. Kac recurrence makes finite almost surely for every , after intersecting the countably many full-measure recurrence events.
For and all sufficiently large integer , fix and set , . Step 3.1 implies and : choose with and apply convergence in probability at these indices. Since a match of length is also a match of length , . Thus with probability tending to one, . Divide by and let to obtain in probability.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.