How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Margulis diamond weight bound
Statement
For every integer and every nonnegative function on with , the quadratic expression in the Fourier reduction satisfies Consequently, for the forward/full adjacency operators and normalized transform in that reduction, for real mean-zero .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let , modulo . Define the forward operator . For real mean-zero , put and Then , , , and the full Margulis adjacency satisfies . (Fourier analysis of margulis adjacency).
Proof
Represent each coordinate in . Define when both absolute coordinates of are at least those of , with one strict. Put if , if , and otherwise; then . Squaring gives . Apply this to each term of and reindex the inverse-shear terms; a shear leaves its corresponding cosine coordinate fixed. The coefficient at is bounded by , where .
Outside the open diamond , let and . They lie in with , so . Each weight is at most , giving coefficient at most . This includes the diamond boundary and the centered-coordinate endpoints.
Inside the diamond and away from zero, sign changes and coordinate interchange permute the four shear neighbors and preserve their absolute-coordinate order. First suppose the absolute coordinates are with . The change strictly decreases its absolute value. For , the centered absolute value is , since . For , both and exceed by the same strict inequality. For , both and exceed , the latter since . Thus exactly three neighbors dominate and one is dominated, including when a coordinate wraps. The coefficient is at most .
If , then . Two neighbors preserve the pair of absolute coordinates, and the other two replace one coordinate by , because both and exceed . If , two neighbors fix the point and two change the zero coordinate to a nonzero centered residue of , since . In either case there are two weights and two weights , giving at most . The zero point contributes nothing because ; this also handles .
Every point is covered by the preceding cases. Summing the coefficient bounds proves the claim for . The Fourier reduction gives and Parseval gives , proving the stated consequence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.