How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Metric Borel hierarchy inclusions and fixed-rank operations
Statement
Assume ZFC and let be metrizable. For ,
At each positive rank, is closed under countable unions and finite intersections; under countable intersections and finite unions; and under complements, finite unions and finite intersections. The finite operations include the empty family. No countable basis is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
The positive-rank union/complement definitions are The countable Borel hierarchy and its limit convention.
Fix a compatible metric as in Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric.
Transfinite induction is available by Transfinite induction.
Assume The Axiom of Choice; it will select countably many lower-rank representations.
Proof
Given: A metrizable and the axiom assumptions above.
For open put . Each is closed: if for one , every point within of has the same strict inequality, by the triangle inequality. Also , since permits . If , some ball of radius about lies in ; take with to get . Hence . For the universal condition is vacuous and ; for every is empty.
We prove the operations by F3, simultaneously at each positive rank. At rank one, opens are closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections, and closed sets have the dual operations. Suppose the assertion holds below . Given , A1 chooses sequences , , with . The explicit diagonal enumeration of turns into an allowed representation, proving countable-union closure.
We first prove the inclusions directly. If , every lower- representation allowed for is allowed for . For , step 1.1 supplies a representation using , so the same inclusion holds. Complementing gives . A constant sequence represents every set as a set. Complementing that inclusion gives . Together these are the displayed inclusion in .
For two such sets, . Put . Step 2.1 raises both sets to , and the earlier-rank assertion gives their intersection in (repeat either set to view the intersection as countable). Thus the displayed union belongs to . Iteration proves finite intersections. The empty intersection is , which is in every class by F1.
De Morgan's identities transfer the two closure assertions to the two assertions at the same rank, completing the progressive step of F3. A finite union or intersection of sets in both classes remains in both, by these assertions; complement interchanges their two memberships. The empty finite union is and the empty finite intersection is . This proves all claims, including empty , at every positive countable rank. QED.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lemma 2.5(i) and Lemma 2.6(i–iii), printed pp15–16 (PDF pages 15–16); source numbering in previous notes was one page low (standard reference, not scraped)