Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Metric Borel hierarchy inclusions and fixed-rank operations

Statement

Assume ZFC and let X be metrizable. For 1α<β<ω1,

Σα0(X)Πα0(X)Δβ0(X).

At each positive rank, Σα0 is closed under countable unions and finite intersections; Πα0 under countable intersections and finite unions; and Δα0 under complements, finite unions and finite intersections. The finite operations include the empty family. No countable basis is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The positive-rank union/complement definitions are The countable Borel hierarchy and its limit convention.

[F3]

Transfinite induction is available by Transfinite induction.

[A1]

Assume The Axiom of Choice; it will select countably many lower-rank representations.

Proof

Given: A metrizable X and the axiom assumptions above.

1.1

For open U put Fn={x:(yU) d(x,y)1/(n+1)}. Each Fn is closed: if d(x,y)<1/(n+1) for one yU, every point within 1/(n+1)d(x,y) of x has the same strict inequality, by the triangle inequality. Also FnU, since xU permits y=x. If xU, some ball of radius r>0 about x lies in U; take n with 1/(n+1)r to get xFn. Hence U=nFn. For U=X the universal condition is vacuous and Fn=X; for U= every Fn is empty.

F2
1.2

We prove the operations by F3, simultaneously at each positive rank. At rank one, opens are closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections, and closed sets have the dual operations. Suppose the assertion holds below α>1. Given AiΣα0, A1 chooses sequences BijΠβij0, 1βij<α, with Ai=jBij. The explicit diagonal enumeration of N2 turns iAi=i,jBij into an allowed representation, proving countable-union closure.

F1F3A1
2.1

We first prove the inclusions directly. If 1<α<β, every lower-Π representation allowed for Σα0 is allowed for Σβ0. For α=1<β, step 1.1 supplies a representation using Π10, so the same inclusion holds. Complementing gives Πα0Πβ0. A constant sequence represents every Πα0 set as a Σβ0 set. Complementing that inclusion gives Σα0Πβ0. Together these are the displayed inclusion in Δβ0.

F1step 1.1
3.1

For two such sets, A0A1=i,j(B0iB1j). Put γ=max(β0i,β1j)<α. Step 2.1 raises both sets to Πγ0, and the earlier-rank assertion gives their intersection in Πγ0 (repeat either set to view the intersection as countable). Thus the displayed union belongs to Σα0. Iteration proves finite intersections. The empty intersection is X, which is in every class by F1.

F1step 2.1step 1.2
4.1

De Morgan's identities transfer the two Σ closure assertions to the two Π assertions at the same rank, completing the progressive step of F3. A finite union or intersection of sets in both classes remains in both, by these assertions; complement interchanges their two memberships. The empty finite union is and the empty finite intersection is X. This proves all claims, including empty X, at every positive countable rank. QED.

F1F3step 1.2step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources