Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Propagator call counts for the two-level MGRIT cycle

Statement

For the literal operations of A declared two-level MGRIT coarse-correction cycle, put Nf=N and Nc=N/m. One F-relaxation uses Nf−Nc−1 fine-propagator calls; one C-relaxation uses Nc; and one FCF-relaxation uses 2(Nf−Nc−1)+Nc. The specified coarse forward substitution uses Nc practical coarse-propagator applications, including the evaluation at z0=0. These counts concern completed operations without eliminating calls at zero inputs.

In an additive accounting model with nonnegative call costs cΦ,cΨ, the modeled work is nΦcΦ+nΨcΨ+κ, where nΦ,nΨ count all executed calls and κ accounts for all remaining work. Residuals, restriction, interpolation and stopping checks must contribute their actual calls and overhead; cached values incur no new call. A parallel schedule must respect the serial order within each F-interval and in the coarse solve, and its communication and synchronization. No measured speedup is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The declared literal implementation, m≥2 dividing N, completed operations and the additive accounting convention of the Statement.

[F1]

A declared two-level MGRIT coarse-correction cycle updates every F-index, using u1=b1 without a propagator; each other F-update and each C-update applies one fine propagator. FCF means F, then C, then F. The coarse solve computes zj=ρj+Ψjzj−1 for j=1,…,Nc.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

There are Nc C-indices among Nf unknowns, leaving Nf−Nc F-indices. Exactly the boundary assignment u1=b1 in [F1] omits a fine call, giving Nf−Nc−1 calls. Each of the Nc C-updates makes one call. Adding two F counts and one C count gives the stated FCF count, including N=m=2, where the F count is zero.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

The coarse loop in [F1] has Nc iterations and executes one application per iteration, including Ψ1z0. Summing the stipulated charge for every executed call and remaining operation gives the work formula. Each F-index uses the preceding index in its interval, and the coarse loop uses zj−1; any execution schedule must preserve these dependencies and account for its other costs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources