Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal delta substitution identity for module Jacobi

Statement

With the two-variable formal delta distribution and binomial expansions of Formal distributions and fields on a vector space,

z0−1δ ⁣(z1−z2z0)−z0−1δ ⁣(z2−z1−z0)=z2−1δ ⁣(z1−z0z2),

where the first term expands in nonnegative powers of z2, the second in nonnegative powers of z1, and the right side in nonnegative powers of z0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Three independent formal variables z0,z1,z2 and the formal delta and binomial-expansion conventions of Formal distributions and fields on a vector space.

[F1]

Formal distributions and fields on a vector space: for every integer r, ιz1,z2(z1−z2)r=∑j≥0(rj)(−1)jz1r−jz2j and ιz2,z1(z1−z2)r=∑j≥0(rj)z1j(−z2)r−j; δ(x)=∑n∈Zxn.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

For N≥0, the coefficient of z0−N−1 in the first term is the polynomial (z1−z2)N expanded in z2. In the second term the same coefficient is (z1−z2)N expanded in z1: the sign from (−z0)−N cancels the sign in (z2−z1)N. These are the same polynomial, so their difference is zero. The right side has only nonnegative powers of z0.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Fix j≥0. The coefficient of z0j in the first term is ∑k≥0(j+kj)z1−j−1−kz2k. The coefficient in the second delta term before its outer minus is (−1)j+1∑k≥0(j+kj)z1kz2−j−1−k, by expanding (z2−z1)−j−1 in nonnegative powers of z1. Thus the left-side coefficient is the sum of the first series and (−1)j times ∑k≥0(j+kj)z1kz2−j−1−k. On the right, the coefficient is (−1)j∑n∈Z(nj)z1n−jz2−n−1. Splitting at n=j, using n=−1−k for the negative indices and (−1−kj)=(−1)j(j+kj), gives exactly the same two series. Coefficients of every integer power of z0 agree, proving the identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources