How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The standard one-tape simulation of a fixed multitape machine has quadratic overhead
Statement
Fix a deterministic -tape Turing machine and the standard one-tape simulator from Every fixed multitape Turing machine has an equivalent one-tape simulation. There is a constant such that, for every input word and every , after simulating steps of on the simulator has used at most tape cells and at most time.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fixed deterministic -tape Turing machine , its standard one-tape simulator , an input word , and an integer .
The standard one-tape simulator stores the simulated tapes as marked blocks separated by delimiters, scans those blocks to read one simulated step, and may shift a block right when a head first enters a fresh blank cell, by Every fixed multitape Turing machine has an equivalent one-tape simulation.
Proof
After steps of , each simulated head has moved by at most cells from its initial position, so tape can have visited only the cells in an interval of length at most . Therefore the explicit block for tape in the encoding from [L1] has length , with an implied constant depending only on the fixed machine .
Summing over the fixed number of tapes, and absorbing the fixed delimiter overhead, the whole one-tape encoding after simulated steps has length at most for some constant .
One simulation cycle of at stage performs a constant number of full sweeps across that length- encoding and, when needed, one local shift of a suffix of the same order. Hence the time for the th simulated step is at most for some constant .
Summing the estimate from step 3.1 for gives for a suitable constant . Together with step 2.1, this proves the claimed linear space bound and quadratic time bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Brubaker and Lance Fortnow, Church-Turing Thesis lesson notes (standard reference, not scraped)