Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The BGG differential induces an injection into kernel coinvariants (BGG 10.6)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let λ∈Λ+, let k≥0, and assume that C∙(λ) is exact in degrees 0,…,k−1, that is, im⁡dj+1=ker⁡dj for 0≤j≤k−1 (vacuous for k=0). Let dk+1 ⁣:Ck+1(λ)→Ck(λ) be the BGG differential of The BGG differential from signed Verma maps. Then the induced map

dˉk+1 ⁣:Ck+1(λ)/n−Ck+1(λ)→ker⁡dk/n−ker⁡dk

is injective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a dominant integral weight λ∈Λ+, an integer k≥0, the BGG complex C∙(λ) together with the hypothesis that it is exact in degrees 0,…,k−1, and the induced map dˉk+1 on n−-coinvariants.

[F1]

Ck+1(λ)=⨁ℓ(w)=k+1M(w∘λ); each M(w∘λ)≅U(n−)vw is free over U(n−) on its highest weight vector vw, and M(w∘λ)/n−M(w∘λ)=Cvˉw with vˉw of weight w∘λ; the weights w∘λ for w∈Wk+1 are pairwise distinct, so {vˉw:w∈Wk+1} is a basis of Ck+1(λ)/n−Ck+1(λ) consisting of h-eigenvectors of distinct weights (The PBW model of a Verma module, The Bruhat graph and the BGG Verma sum in degree k, Positive coroot pairings of a dominant integral weight, The classical BGG category O).

[F2]

dk+1 is a g-homomorphism, hence h-equivariant, and dk∘dk+1=0; therefore dk+1 maps Ck+1(λ) into ker⁡dk, and its restriction φw:=dk+1∣M(w∘λ) to each summand is a g-homomorphism M(w∘λ)→ker⁡dk; the induced map dˉk+1 on coinvariants is h-equivariant because n−Ck+1(λ) and n−ker⁡dk are h-stable (The BGG differential squares to zero, The BGG differential from signed Verma maps, The classical BGG category O).

[F3]

For w∈Wk+1 the vector dk+1(vw) is nonzero. Its component in the summand M(w′∘λ) of Ck(λ) is ε(w,w′)ιw→w′(vw) for every cover w⊳w′; since ℓ(w)=k+1≥1 there is at least one such cover, because for a suitable simple reflection si one has ℓ(wsi)=ℓ(w)−1 and then wsi⊲w is a cover; each ιw→w′ is injective, so each displayed component is nonzero, and a tuple of vectors in a direct sum is nonzero as soon as one component is (The BGG differential from signed Verma maps, Bruhat covers give canonical Verma embeddings, and composites are inclusions, Finite Weyl strong exchange and deletion).

[F4]

BGG 10.6b (Nonzero highest-weight images survive modulo n-minus (BGG 10.6b)): if M∈O has all composition factors of the form L(u∘λ) with ℓ(u)≥ℓ(w0), and φ ⁣:M(w0∘λ)→M satisfies φ(v)≠0 for a highest weight vector v, then φ(v)∉n−M.

[F5]

BGG 10.6a (Composition factors of the BGG kernel lie above the degree (BGG 10.6a)): under the present hypothesis, every composition factor of ker⁡dk is of the form L(u∘λ) with ℓ(u)≥k+1; moreover ker⁡dk is an object of O, being a subobject of Ck(λ)∈O (The classical BGG category O).

[F6]

If an h-equivariant linear map between h-semisimple modules is nonzero on each vector of a basis consisting of eigenvectors of pairwise distinct weights, then it is injective: the images are nonzero eigenvectors of pairwise distinct weights, hence linearly independent. This is ordinary linear algebra (The classical BGG category O).

Proof

1.1F1F2F6

By [F1] the domain Ck+1(λ)/n−Ck+1(λ) has the basis {vˉw} of eigenvectors of pairwise distinct weights, and dˉk+1 is h-equivariant by [F2]. Suppose dˉk+1(vˉw)≠0 for every w. Then the images dˉk+1(vˉw) are nonzero eigenvectors of the pairwise distinct weights w∘λ; by the linear algebra in [F6] they are linearly independent, so dˉk+1 is injective on the basis and therefore injective.

1.2F2F3

Fix w∈Wk+1. By [F3] dk+1(vw)≠0, and by [F2] dk+1 takes values in ker⁡dk, so φw(vw)=dk+1(vw)≠0.

2.1F4F5step 1.2

Apply [F4] with M=ker⁡dk and w0=w. By [F5], every composition factor of ker⁡dk is L(u∘λ) with ℓ(u)≥k+1=ℓ(w); ker⁡dk∈O; and φw ⁣:M(w∘λ)→ker⁡dk is a g-homomorphism with φw(vw)≠0. Hence φw(vw)∉n−ker⁡dk, i.e. the class of dk+1(vw) in ker⁡dk/n−ker⁡dk is nonzero. But that class is exactly dˉk+1(vˉw).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Since w∈Wk+1 was arbitrary, step 2.1 shows dˉk+1(vˉw)≠0 for every basis vector; by step 1.1 the map dˉk+1 is injective.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources