How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The BGG differential induces an injection into kernel coinvariants (BGG 10.6)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , let , and assume that is exact in degrees , that is, for (vacuous for ). Let be the BGG differential of The BGG differential from signed Verma maps. Then the induced map
is injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a dominant integral weight , an integer , the BGG complex together with the hypothesis that it is exact in degrees , and the induced map on -coinvariants.
; each is free over on its highest weight vector , and with of weight ; the weights for are pairwise distinct, so is a basis of consisting of -eigenvectors of distinct weights (The PBW model of a Verma module, The Bruhat graph and the BGG Verma sum in degree k, Positive coroot pairings of a dominant integral weight, The classical BGG category O).
is a -homomorphism, hence -equivariant, and ; therefore maps into , and its restriction to each summand is a -homomorphism ; the induced map on coinvariants is -equivariant because and are -stable (The BGG differential squares to zero, The BGG differential from signed Verma maps, The classical BGG category O).
For the vector is nonzero. Its component in the summand of is for every cover ; since there is at least one such cover, because for a suitable simple reflection one has and then is a cover; each is injective, so each displayed component is nonzero, and a tuple of vectors in a direct sum is nonzero as soon as one component is (The BGG differential from signed Verma maps, Bruhat covers give canonical Verma embeddings, and composites are inclusions, Finite Weyl strong exchange and deletion).
BGG 10.6b (Nonzero highest-weight images survive modulo n-minus (BGG 10.6b)): if has all composition factors of the form with , and satisfies for a highest weight vector , then .
BGG 10.6a (Composition factors of the BGG kernel lie above the degree (BGG 10.6a)): under the present hypothesis, every composition factor of is of the form with ; moreover is an object of , being a subobject of (The classical BGG category O).
If an -equivariant linear map between -semisimple modules is nonzero on each vector of a basis consisting of eigenvectors of pairwise distinct weights, then it is injective: the images are nonzero eigenvectors of pairwise distinct weights, hence linearly independent. This is ordinary linear algebra (The classical BGG category O).
Proof
By [F1] the domain has the basis of eigenvectors of pairwise distinct weights, and is -equivariant by [F2]. Suppose for every . Then the images are nonzero eigenvectors of the pairwise distinct weights ; by the linear algebra in [F6] they are linearly independent, so is injective on the basis and therefore injective.
Fix . By [F3] , and by [F2] takes values in , so .
Apply [F4] with and . By [F5], every composition factor of is with ; ; and is a -homomorphism with . Hence , i.e. the class of in is nonzero. But that class is exactly .
Since was arbitrary, step 2.1 shows for every basis vector; by step 1.1 the map is injective.
Depends on
- Bruhat covers give canonical Verma embeddings, and composites are inclusions
- The BGG differential from signed Verma maps
- Surjectivity modulo n-minus for free weight-generated modules (BGG 10.5)
- Composition factors of the BGG kernel lie above the degree (BGG 10.6a)
- Nonzero highest-weight images survive modulo n-minus (BGG 10.6b)
- The PBW model of a Verma module
- The Axiom of Choice
- The BGG differential squares to zero
- The Bruhat graph and the BGG Verma sum in degree k
- Positive coroot pairings of a dominant integral weight
- Finite Weyl strong exchange and deletion
- The classical BGG category O
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Fan Zhou, The classical and the functorial BGG resolutions (Columbia thesis 2021), Part I Sec. 4.2.2, pp. 22-24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Rocha-Caridi, Splitting criteria for modules induced from a subalgebra of a semisimple Lie algebra, Trans. AMS 262 (1980), Sec. 10, Lemma 10.5, pp. 354-355 (standard reference, not scraped)