Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A whole-space Fourier splitting for compactly supported H(curl) fields

Statement

Assume AC. Let U∈H(curl⁡;R3) be real and supported in a fixed bounded measurable set A of finite measure. There are real fields w∈H1(R3;R3) and p∈H1(R3) depending linearly on U such that U=w+∇p, div⁡w=0, curl⁡w=curl⁡U, and ∥w∥2≤∥U∥2,∥∇w∥2=∥curl⁡U∥2,∥p∥H1≤CA∥U∥2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the real field U. Use the repository's Fourier normalization Djf^=2πiξjf^.

[F1]

The Fourier transform is unitary on complex L2 by Plancherel theorem, agrees with the integral transform on L1∩L2 by Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms, and realizes weak derivatives as multipliers by Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers. Weighted L2 Fourier integrability characterizes H1 by Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms. Their CC assumptions follow from AC.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Since U is supported in A, Holder gives ∥U∥1≤∣A∣1/2∥U∥2, and therefore ∣U^(ξ)∣≤∣A∣1/2∥U∥2. For ξ≠0 define p^(ξ)=ξ⋅U^(ξ)2πi∣ξ∣2,w^(ξ)=U^(ξ)−ξ(ξ⋅U^(ξ))∣ξ∣2. Set both values at zero arbitrarily, for instance zero. The multiplier defining w^ is an orthogonal projection in C3, so ∥w^∥2≤∥U^∥2, and 2πiξp^ is the complementary orthogonal projection of U^. At ∣ξ∣<1, ∣p^∣2≤(4π2)−1∣A∣∥U∥22∣ξ∣−2, whose integral is finite in dimension three; at ∣ξ∣≥1 it is bounded by (4π2)−1∣U^∣2. Thus p∈H1 and ∥p∥H1≤CA∥U∥2 by [F1]. This is the essential low-frequency check; an arbitrary nonsupported L2 field would not give it.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The vector identity ∣ξ∣2∣w^∣2=∣ξ×U^∣2 and the multiplier identity for curl give ∫4π2∣ξ∣2∣w^∣2=∥curl⁡U∥22. Hence w∈H1, with the asserted derivative norm. The displayed Fourier definitions give U=w+∇p, ξ⋅w^=0, and ξ×w^=ξ×U^, so all asserted distributional identities follow by Fourier injectivity. Finally U^(−ξ)=U^(ξ)‾ for real U. The two definitions have the corresponding conjugate symmetry (including the sign of i in p^); uniqueness of the inverse transform therefore gives real p,w. Every operation is linear, and [F1] supplies all norm claims.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources