Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A bounded regular decomposition with both summands satisfying full Dirichlet conditions

Statement

Assume AC. Let Ω⊂R3 be a nonempty bounded Lipschitz open set. There are bounded real linear maps R:H0(curl⁡;Ω)→H01(Ω;R3) and Q:H0(curl⁡;Ω)→H01(Ω) such that u=Ru+∇Qu,∥Ru∥H1+∥Qu∥H1≤CΩ∥u∥H(curl⁡). No contractibility, connected boundary, or mesh hypothesis is required. The scalar estimate uses the full H(curl) norm; no estimate by curl alone is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the nonempty bounded Lipschitz open set Ω, and u in the closure-defined zero-tangential space.

[F1]

Whole-space support and the zero-boundary Sobolev closure gives the whole-space H(curl) zero extension and characterizes supported whole-space H1 restrictions as H01.

[F2]

A whole-space Fourier splitting for compactly supported H(curl) fields supplies the bounded linear whole-space split U=w+∇p, with w∈H1(R3) and p∈H1(R3).

[F3]

Scalar H1 and H2 extension across a bounded Lipschitz boundary supplies a bounded scalar H2 extension on every bounded Lipschitz open set, including one with several components.

[F4]

Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization with K=Ω‾⋐B supplies the fixed smooth cutoff χ in step 2.1, equal to one on a neighborhood of K. Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor at k=1,p=2 gives the whole-space H1 product identities and estimates for Z,P. Its explicit CC assumption follows from the stated AC.

Proof

1.1F1F2constructalgebraF3

Fix a ball B with Ω‾⋐B, let U be the zero extension of u by [F1], and use [F2] with support Ω‾. Then U=w+∇p, ∥w∥H1≤C∥u∥H(curl⁡), and ∥p∥H1≤CΩ∥u∥2. The exterior open set D=B∖Ω‾ has Lipschitz boundary: near ∂Ω use the same graph with the opposite side, and near ∂B use the smooth sphere; these boundary sets are a positive distance apart. It may have several components, which [F3] permits. On D, U=0, so ∇p=−w. Hence p∣D∈H2(D), with ∥p∥H2(D)≤CΩ∥u∥H(curl⁡). This follows directly from the definition of second weak derivatives: DiDjp=−Diwj∈L2(D).

2.1F1F3step 1.1constructalgebraF4∎

Extend p∣D by [F3] to a=ED(p∣D)∈H2(R3). Choose one fixed χ∈Cc∞(B) equal to one near Ω‾, and define whole-space fields Z=χ(w+∇a) and P=χ(p−a). Both are in H1(R3) with norms bounded by CΩ∥u∥H(curl⁡). On D, a=p and ∇a=∇p=−w almost everywhere, so Z=P=0 there; outside B their cutoff makes them zero. Thus they vanish almost everywhere outside Ω‾. By [F1], z=Z∣Ω∈H01(Ω;R3) and q=P∣Ω∈H01(Ω). On Ω, χ=1 and its gradient is zero, giving z+∇q=w+∇a+∇p−∇a=u. Fixed zero extension, Fourier multipliers, ED, and cutoff make the maps R:u↦z, Q:u↦q linear; their estimates have just been proved. Only the geometry of Ω,B, not a mesh or a topological assumption, enters the constants.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources