How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Inverse positivity of discounted finite-state policy matrices
Statement
For every policy in Finite-state discounted generator Bellman system, the matrix is nonsingular, is entrywise nonnegative, and each diagonal entry of is strictly positive.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite state set, , and policy generator coefficients with for and .
For the policy generator, off the diagonal, , and (Finite-state discounted generator Bellman system).
A real square matrix with trivial kernel is invertible (Invertible matrix theorem: invertibility, full pivot rank, RREF , trivial nullspace and unique solvability are equivalent).
Every nonempty finite set of real numbers attains its maximum and minimum (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum).
Proof
Nonsingularity. Suppose for a nonzero real vector . The finite set has a maximum by [F3]; choose an index attaining it, so . By the zero row sum, . If , every term in the sum is nonnegative and , contradicting . If , every sum term is nonpositive and , again a contradiction. Thus the kernel is zero, and [F2] makes the square matrix nonsingular.
Inverse positivity. Let and let , which exists by step 1.1. If at an index where is minimal, then , contradicting . The finite set of coordinates of attains its minimum by [F3], so this argument proves for every . Applying it to each standard basis vector shows that every entry of is nonnegative.
Positive diagonal. Fix and set by step 2.1. If , then , while . Hence . This proves the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Wang He, Reinforcement Learning: A Mathematical Introduction, Chapter 10, Policy Improvement and Policy Iteration (standard reference, not scraped)