Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A shrinking clamped-stream correction on the square

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D=(0,1)2, b∈C∞(D‾) vanish on ∂D, and choose ρ∈C∞([0,∞)) equal to 1 on [0,1/3] and 0 on [1,∞). Set d1=x, d2=1−x, d3=y, d4=1−y, and Rℓ(x,y)=1−∏i=14(1−ρ(di/ℓ)),0<ℓ<1/16. This function is 1 near the boundary and supported in strips of total area at most 4ℓ. There is C, independent of ℓ, such that ∥∇(bRℓ)∥∞≤C,∥Dk(bRℓ)∥2≤Cℓ3/2−k(k=1,2,3). For ℓ(t)=t, 0<t<T<1/256, ∥∂t∇(bRt)∥2≤Ct−1t1/4. If m∈C1((0,T)), rot⁡ψ=(ψy,−ψx), and r=−mrot⁡(bRt), then ∥r∥∞≤C∣m∣,∥r∥2≤C∣m∣t1/4,∥∇r∥2≤C∣m∣t−1/4, ∥rt∥2+∥Δr∥2≤C(∣m′∣t1/4+∣m∣t−3/4). Moreover bRℓ=0 and ∂n(bRℓ)=∂nb on each side. Thus if a smooth stream Ψ has zero boundary value and ∂nΨ=m∂nb, then Ψ−mbRℓ has both zero value and zero normal derivative there, and its rotation has zero velocity trace. On any fixed J⋐(0,1) and sufficiently small t, the additional estimate ∥∂xr∥L∞(J×(0,1))≤CJ∣m∣ holds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the square, smooth b,ρ, and the parameters of the Statement.

[F1]

The product and chain rules apply to these finite products of smooth scalar functions. (Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives)

[F2]

A function supported in a set of area at most A and bounded by B has L2 norm at most A1/2B. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

The product formula shows that Rℓ=1 whenever some di<ℓ/3, and Rℓ=0 whenever every di≥ℓ. The supporting union has area at most 4ℓ. Smoothness follows from the finite product. Because b=0 on each side, the fundamental theorem in its normal coordinate gives ∣b(x,y)∣≤Cdi(x,y) for every side i, and ∇b and all fixed higher derivatives are bounded on the closed square.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Expand Dk(bRℓ) by the product rule. Every spatial derivative on a cutoff costs at most Cℓ−1. If at least one cutoff is differentiated, choose that side i; on that term's support di≤ℓ, so an undifferentiated b supplies a factor Cℓ. Thus the terms with no derivative on b have magnitude at most Cℓ1−k. If j≥1 derivatives hit b, the other factors cost at most Cℓ−(k−j)≤Cℓ1−k. Terms with no differentiated cutoff have the same bound for k≥1. All terms are supported in the union from step 1.1. Therefore ∥Dk(bRℓ)∥2≤Cℓ3/2−k for k=1,2,3; for k=1 the pointwise bound also gives ∥∇(bRℓ)∥∞≤C. Intersections of strips require no disjointness: the bound uses any differentiated side and the total union area.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

With ℓ=t, a time derivative of ρ(di/ℓ) is bounded by Ct−1 and is supported where di≤ℓ. One extra spatial derivative costs at most Cℓ−1, offset by b=O(ℓ) if it does not hit b. If it hits b, its derivative is bounded. Hence ∣∂t∇(bRt)∣≤Ct−1 on the same union of strips, and its L2 norm is at most Ct−1ℓ1/2. Differentiating r and applying step 2.1 with k=1,2,3 gives every asserted bound for r, rt and Δr.

4.1F1step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Near each boundary point Rℓ=1, so the boundary value of bRℓ is zero and its normal derivative equals that of b. Subtraction therefore cancels the stated stream trace and normal derivative. The tangential derivative of a zero boundary stream is zero, so its rotation has both zero normal and zero tangential velocity on each side. For x∈J and sufficiently small t, the cutoffs of the vertical sides vanish identically and R depends only on y. Since b(x,0)=b(x,1)=0, also bx,bxx vanish on those edges and satisfy ∣bx∣+∣bxx∣≤Cmin⁡(y,1−y). Consequently ∂xr=−mrot⁡(bxR) is bounded by CJ∣m∣: the only factor Ry=O(ℓ−1) is multiplied by bx=O(ℓ) in its supporting strip. This proves the last estimate and completes the proof.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources