How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A shrinking clamped-stream correction on the square
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , vanish on , and choose equal to on and on . Set , , , , and This function is near the boundary and supported in strips of total area at most . There is , independent of , such that For , , If , , and , then Moreover and on each side. Thus if a smooth stream has zero boundary value and , then has both zero value and zero normal derivative there, and its rotation has zero velocity trace. On any fixed and sufficiently small , the additional estimate holds.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the square, smooth , and the parameters of the Statement.
The product and chain rules apply to these finite products of smooth scalar functions. (Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives)
A function supported in a set of area at most and bounded by has norm at most . (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)
Proof
The product formula shows that whenever some , and whenever every . The supporting union has area at most . Smoothness follows from the finite product. Because on each side, the fundamental theorem in its normal coordinate gives for every side , and and all fixed higher derivatives are bounded on the closed square.
Expand by the product rule. Every spatial derivative on a cutoff costs at most . If at least one cutoff is differentiated, choose that side ; on that term's support , so an undifferentiated supplies a factor . Thus the terms with no derivative on have magnitude at most . If derivatives hit , the other factors cost at most . Terms with no differentiated cutoff have the same bound for . All terms are supported in the union from step 1.1. Therefore for ; for the pointwise bound also gives . Intersections of strips require no disjointness: the bound uses any differentiated side and the total union area.
With , a time derivative of is bounded by and is supported where . One extra spatial derivative costs at most , offset by if it does not hit . If it hits , its derivative is bounded. Hence on the same union of strips, and its norm is at most . Differentiating and applying step 2.1 with gives every asserted bound for , and .
Near each boundary point , so the boundary value of is zero and its normal derivative equals that of . Subtraction therefore cancels the stated stream trace and normal derivative. The tangential derivative of a zero boundary stream is zero, so its rotation has both zero normal and zero tangential velocity on each side. For and sufficiently small , the cutoffs of the vertical sides vanish identically and depends only on . Since , also vanish on those edges and satisfy . Consequently is bounded by : the only factor is multiplied by in its supporting strip. This proves the last estimate and completes the proof.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661, Chapter 53: Stokes equations (standard reference, not scraped)