Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar weak equations give a weakly continuous Hilbert-space representative

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let 0<T<∞, let H be a separable real Hilbert space, let X⊆H be a dense real linear subspace, and let u0∈H. Suppose u∈L2(0,T;H) and ∥u(t)∥H≤M for almost every t, for some finite M. Suppose also that for every v∈X there is hv∈L1(0,T) such that, for every η∈C1([0,T]) vanishing near T, −∫0T(u(t),v)Hη′(t) dt=∫0Thv(t)η(t) dt+(u0,v)Hη(0). Then there is a unique weakly continuous map u~:[0,T]→H equal to u almost everywhere and satisfying u~(0)=u0. Here weak continuity means that t↦(u~(t),w)H is continuous for every w∈H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, 0<T<∞, a separable real Hilbert space H, a dense real linear subspace X⊆H, u0∈H, and the scalar weak equations in the Statement.

[F1]

If a scalar g∈L1(0,T) has distributional derivative h∈L1(0,T), then it has a unique absolutely continuous representative on [0,T] with derivative h almost everywhere. (One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives)

[F2]

A locally integrable function that induces the zero distribution is zero almost everywhere; thus an L1 distributional derivative is unique almost everywhere. (Locally integrable functions embed in distributions)

[F3]

Every bounded real linear functional on a real Hilbert space is inner product with a unique vector. (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces)

[F4]

A separable space has a countable dense subset. (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset)

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice supplies Countable Choice, which selects a point from each nonempty member of the countable family of balls used to construct a dense subset of X. (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

Proof

1.1A1F4givenchoose

Choose a countable dense set D⊆H by [F4]. For every d∈D and positive rational r for which BH(d,r)∩X≠∅, choose one point of that intersection using [A1]; the resulting countable set W⊆X is dense in H. Indeed, given y∈H and ϵ>0, choose d∈D with ∥y−d∥H<ϵ/4, then a rational r with ∥y−d∥H<r<ϵ−∥y−d∥H; density of X makes the selected point available and it lies within ϵ of y. The rational linear span W0 of W is still countable and dense in H.

1.2A1F1given

For w∈W0, set gw(t)=(u(t),w)H almost everywhere. Since T<∞ and u∈L2(0,T;H), gw∈L1(0,T); the scalar weak equation implies its distributional derivative is hw. By [F1] it has a unique absolutely continuous representative Gw on [0,T]. Integration by parts for Gw and comparison with the given identity give Gw(0)=(u0,w)H. Moreover ∣gw(t)∣≤M∥w∥H almost everywhere, so continuity gives ∣Gw(t)∣≤M∥w∥H for every t∈[0,T].

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

For w,z∈W0 and rational q, the identities gw+z=gw+gz and gqw=qgw hold almost everywhere. The corresponding identities for the continuous representatives hold everywhere, since two continuous functions equal almost everywhere on [0,T] are equal everywhere. Thus for each fixed t, w↦Gw(t) is rational-linear on W0 and bounded by M∥w∥H. It extends uniquely by continuity from the dense set W0 to a bounded real-linear functional Lt on H; real linearity follows by approximating any real scalar by rationals.

3.1F3F5step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

By [F3], there is a unique u~(t)∈H with (u~(t),w)H=Lt(w) for every w∈H. For w∈W0, t↦(u~(t),w)H=Gw(t) is continuous, and ∥u~(t)∥H≤M. For any z∈H, approximate it in norm by wk∈W0; then sup⁡t∣(u~(t),z−wk)H∣≤M∥z−wk∥H, so t↦(u~(t),z)H is a uniform limit of continuous functions and is continuous. Since Gw(0)=(u0,w)H on the dense set W0, Riesz uniqueness gives u~(0)=u0. Choose a strongly measurable representative of u. For each w∈W0, (u~(t),w)H=(u(t),w)H outside a null set; [F5] makes their countable union null. Outside that union the two vectors have the same inner products with the dense set W0, hence are equal. Thus u~=u almost everywhere as H-valued functions.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

If u~1 and u~2 are two weakly continuous representatives of u, then for every z∈H their scalar pairings are continuous and agree almost everywhere, hence agree for every t. Since this holds for every z, the Hilbert inner product separates vectors and u~1(t)=u~2(t) for every t.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources