Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nodal second-derivative perturbations bound the natural spline error

Statement

Let x1<⋯<xr be natural interpolation knots, r≥2, and put hi=xi+1−xi and H=max⁡ihi. Let s be the natural cubic interpolant with data yi and nodal second derivatives Mi, with M1=Mr=0. Let M^1=M^r=0 and let s^ be the piecewise cubic formed from the same values yi and the second derivatives M^i using the natural cubic piece formula of Natural cubic interpolation at distinct knots. On the knot hull [x1,xr], if E=max⁡1≤i≤r∣M^i−Mi∣, then ∥s^−s∥L∞([x1,xr])≤H28E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Strictly increasing knots x1<⋯<xr, data yi, the natural interpolant s, and arbitrary replacement nodal second derivatives M^i with the same zero endpoint values.

[F1]

Natural cubic interpolation at distinct knots: on [xi,xi+1] the spline is the cubic with endpoint values yi,yi+1 and endpoint second derivatives Mi,Mi+1.

[A1]

M^1=M1=0 and M^r=Mr=0.

Proof

1.1givenF1A1algebra

Fix i and write h=hi, t=(x−xi)/h∈[0,1], and Δj=M^j−Mj. The cubic difference q=s^−s vanishes at both endpoints. Its second derivative is affine with endpoint values Δi,Δi+1, so q′′(x)=(1−t)Δi+tΔi+1. Integrating this polynomial twice and imposing the zero endpoint values gives s^(x)−s(x)=h26(Δi((1−t)3−(1−t))+Δi+1(t3−t)).

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra∎

On 0≤t≤1, (1−t)−(1−t)3=t(1−t)(2−t)≥0 and t−t3=t(1−t)(1+t)≥0. Their sum is 3t(1−t)≤3/4. Therefore the absolute value in step 1.1 is at most h2E(3/4)/6=h2E/8≤H2E/8. Taking the maximum over the finitely many knot intervals proves the claim on [x1,xr].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources