Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Necessary compatibility for the classical Neumann Poisson problem

Statement

Assume Ω is bounded with C1 boundary, u∈C2(Ω‾), f=−Δu, and outward normal derivative g=∂νu. Then ∫Ωf=−∫∂Ωg.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω. Let Ω be a bounded C1 domain in the published Euclidean surface convention, let n≥2, and let real u∈C2(Ω‾) with f=−Δu and g=∂νu. Complex-valued data are handled by real and imaginary parts.

[A1]

Countable Choice, written ACω, says every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For n≥2, a bounded C1 domain and F∈C1(Ω‾;Rn) satisfy ∫Ωdiv⁡F dx=∫∂ΩF⋅ν dS. (Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).

[F2]

The Laplacian is Δu=div⁡∇u. (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F3]

The classical normal derivative is ∂νu=Du⋅ν for the outward unit normal. (Classical normal derivative).

[F4]

In this surface-integration convention a bounded C1 domain is nonempty and has dimension n≥2. (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF2F3F4algebra

For real u, the gradient field F=∇u belongs to C1(Ω‾;Rn) by the stated C2 closure convention. By [F2], div⁡F=Δu, and by [F3], F⋅ν=g at each boundary point.

2.1step 1.1A1F1

Apply the divergence theorem [F1] to the field in step 1.1. It gives ∫ΩΔu dx=∫∂Ωg dS. This use of [F1] requires exactly the Countable Choice assumption [A1].

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Since f=−Δu, negating the identity in step 2.1 yields ∫Ωf dx=−∫∂Ωg dS. For complex-valued u,f,g, apply this real calculation separately to real and imaginary parts.

4.1step 3.1F3F4cases∎

If f=0, the identity says the total outward Neumann flux is zero; if also g=0, both sides vanish. The theorem applies on every boundary component with the outward orientation specified in [F3]. The domain class in [F4] excludes the empty set and dimensions zero or one. No converse or sufficiency for existence is asserted.

Source notes

Hunter §1.12, Theorem 1.46, printed pp. 17–18, gives the divergence formula; Hunter §2.5, Theorem 2.23, printed p. 32, gives the same flux identity as the first Green formula with the constant test function. The negative sign comes only from f=−Δu.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources