How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Norm map for a commutative torsor with a separable point
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative separated finite-type -group scheme and let be a -torsor over . Here a torsor means a faithfully flat finite-presentation -scheme with an action written for which is an isomorphism . Suppose that has a point with finite separable residue field of degree . Then there is a -morphism with as an identity of morphisms . If is smooth and nonempty, such a point exists.
Facts & Assumptions
A nonempty smooth finite-type scheme has a point with finite separable residue field, under AC. (A nonempty smooth scheme has a finite separable point)
A finite separable extension is simple; splitting fields of nonzero polynomials exist; finitely generated algebraic field extensions are finite; and finite splitting fields of separable polynomials are Galois. (A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple, Every nonzero polynomial over a field has a splitting field, An extension generated by finitely many algebraic elements is finite, Equivalent characterizations of a finite Galois extension)
A morphism after finite Galois extension descends exactly when it is semilinearly equivariant. (Finite Galois descent of morphisms of schemes)
Proof
Given: AC, , , , , and as above.
By [F1], write and take a splitting field of its separable minimal polynomial , of degree . This field is generated by finitely many algebraic roots, hence is finite and Galois by [F1]. The distinct roots of in correspond exactly to the -embeddings , by evaluation at a root. Composing the point with these embeddings gives , permuted by . The torsor isomorphism, restricted to the fibre whose first coordinate is , identifies with by . Its inverse is a morphism , characterized by . Thus as a scheme morphism identity.
Put , using the commutative group law. Semilinear Galois action permutes the summands and therefore preserves this morphism. By [F2], descends to . Summing the identities from step 1.1 gives . Equality of these morphisms descends by the uniqueness in [F2], proving the required identity over . The integer is positive; no division by or characteristic restriction is made. If is nonempty and smooth, [F3] supplies the required point , completing that clause as well. AC is inherited from [F3] when that clause is used.
Scope
This is the norm construction in Milne Lemma 8.22. The finite separable point for a smooth torsor is supplied by A nonempty smooth scheme has a finite separable point. Smoothness of the generic torsor coming from a quotient by an abelian subvariety still has to be established by the local quotient packet. A general closed-point theorem only gives a finite residue extension, which may be inseparable.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- A nonempty smooth scheme has a finite separable point
- Finite Galois descent of morphisms of schemes
- Equivalent characterizations of a finite Galois extension
- A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple
- Every nonzero polynomial over a field has a splitting field
- An extension generated by finitely many algebraic elements is finite
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne, Algebraic Groups (2022), Lemma 8.22, p. 152 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brion, Some structure theorems for algebraic groups, Lemma 4.2.3, pp. 36-37 (standard reference, not scraped)