How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homomorphisms out of a complete ordered field are order-preserving
Statement
Let be a complete ordered field and an ordered field, and let be a field homomorphism (Field homomorphism and embedding). Then is injective and order-preserving: in implies in , and consequently implies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complete ordered field , an ordered field , and a field homomorphism .
, , , ; and every field homomorphism is injective, its kernel being an ideal of the field with (Field homomorphism and embedding).
In a complete ordered field every is a square ; the positive elements are exactly the nonzero squares (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
In any ordered field a nonzero square is positive: (Squares of nonzero elements are positive).
Order via the positive cone: means , means ; trichotomy holds (Ordered field).
Proof
is injective: by [L1] its kernel is an ideal of the field , and since the kernel is .
Fix with ; then , so by [L2] there is with , and since would give , against by [L4].
Applying , , and because and is injective.
By [L3] in , the nonzero square is positive, so ; as was arbitrary, for all .
If then , so ; since by [L1], we get , i.e. .
Hence is an injective, order-preserving field homomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Spivak, Calculus, 4th ed., Ch. 8 (standard reference, not scraped)