Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One Dinur transformation preserves perfect satisfiability

Statement

Let Σ⋆ be the fixed 66-symbol alphabet of Fixed-alphabet reduction with constant gap retention and let Tt be the fixed-alphabet transformation of One fixed-alphabet Dinur transformation, defined for every integer t≥t0 and mapping finite Σ⋆-graphs to finite Σ⋆-graphs. For every such t and every finite binary constraint graph G over Σ⋆, val⁡(G)=1  ⟹  val⁡(Tt(G))=1, including the case in which G is edgeless.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Fix an integer t≥t0 in the transformation domain and a finite binary constraint graph G over Σ⋆ with val⁡(G)=1.

[F1]

Tt(G)=AΣt(Rt(G)) is a finite binary constraint graph over Σ⋆, and Tt maps an edgeless input to an edgeless output. (One fixed-alphabet Dinur transformation)

[F2]

The gap-amplification step has perfect completeness: for every integer t≥t0, val⁡(G)=1 implies val⁡(Rt(G))=1, and edgeless inputs are mapped to edgeless outputs. (A complete uniform graph gap-amplification step)

[F3]

For every fixed alphabet Σ with ∣Σ∣≥2, val⁡(G)=1 if and only if val⁡(AΣ(G))=1; in particular the alphabet reduction is defined at the nondegenerate intermediate alphabet Σt and preserves the value-one property in the forward direction. (Fixed-alphabet reduction with constant gap retention)

[F4]

An edgeless graph has value one and unsatisfaction zero for every labeling, so the premise val⁡(G)=1 holds in the edgeless case. (Constraint graph and labeling value)

Proof

Given: Use the fixed t and the graph G with val⁡(G)=1.

1.1F1F2F3F4givenassume-case edgeless

Assume first that E(G)=∅. Then val⁡(G)=1 by [F4]. The completeness clause of [F2] applied to this input gives val⁡(Rt(G))=1, and Tt(G) is edgeless by [F1] and [F2]. Applying the forward value-one direction of [F3] at Σ=Σt to the graph Rt(G) therefore gives val⁡(Tt(G))=val⁡(AΣt(Rt(G)))=1.

1.2F1F2givenassume-case nonempty

Assume now that E(G)≠∅. The identity Tt(G)=AΣt(Rt(G)) of [F1] rewrites the goal as val⁡(AΣt(Rt(G)))=1. The intermediate graph Rt(G) is a finite binary constraint graph over the alphabet Σt supplied by [F2] and [F1].

1.3F2givenalgebra

The completeness clause of [F2] applies to the input G because val⁡(G)=1, so val⁡(Rt(G))=1.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.2step 1.3algebra

Apply the forward direction of [F3] with the fixed alphabet Σt, whose size is at least two, to the graph Rt(G). Since val⁡(Rt(G))=1, it gives val⁡(AΣt(Rt(G)))=1, that is, val⁡(Tt(G))=1 by the identity of [F1].

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1cases-exhaustive∎

Step 1.1 proves the edgeless case and step 2.1 proves the case of a nonempty edge set; these two cases exhaust all finite inputs, so for the arbitrarily fixed t≥t0, val⁡(G)=1 implies val⁡(Tt(G))=1. No random sampling or selection from a varying family occurs: the two maps are deterministic and the cases are decided by whether the finite edge set is empty.

Remarks

This is the completeness half of Dinur's transformation: a satisfying labeling survives the degree reduction, the powering and the alphabet reduction, because each stage has an explicit extension or lift of satisfying labelings. The present lemma composes the published completeness clauses of A complete uniform graph gap-amplification step and Fixed-alphabet reduction with constant gap retention rather than reproving them, and records the edgeless branch separately so that the value convention is used only where it is needed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources