How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Constraint graph and labeling value
Definition
A binary constraint graph consists of a finite ordinary undirected multigraph, with paired incidence slots as in Regular multigraph and normalized adjacency, a finite nonempty alphabet , and for each edge a relation in a specified endpoint order. Reversing that order transposes the relation. Loops have two incidences and test . Relations are explicit Boolean tables.
For a labeling , is the fraction of ordinary edges satisfied when , and is defined to be when . Put and , . Thus an edgeless graph has value one and unsatisfiability zero for every labeling. Isolated vertices may be removed without changing value. Fractions computed using directed slots agree with edge fractions when . Duplicating each ordinary edge preserves them. An explicit representation uses table entries and endpoint names of bits.
Depends on
Used by
- Duplicating constraints does not change UNSAT Counterexample
- Assignment tester and rejection ratio Definition
- Complete uniform gap-preserving CSP reductions Definition
- Constraint graph powering with local-view labels Definition
- Constraint graph regularization Definition
- Degree reduction by expander incidence clouds Definition
- Gap csp Definition
- Graph power and walk constraint Definition
- Plurality decoding of powered local views Definition
- Shared codeword blocks and edge acceptance circuits Definition
- A single equality edge through robust composition Example
- False: graph powering alone keeps the alphabet fixed False statement
- Repeating constraints amplifies the gap False statement
- A three-CNF formula as a fixed-alphabet binary constraint graph Lemma
- Bounded-arity Boolean constraints become binary graph constraints Lemma
- Canonical local views preserve perfect satisfiability Lemma
- Composition preserves perfect satisfiability Lemma
- Composition transfers a constant fraction of unsatisfaction Lemma
- Gate constraints are a weak assignment tester Lemma
- Logarithmic iteration reaches a constant unsatisfaction gap Lemma
- Nearby lazy-walk lengths have close endpoint and claim laws Lemma
- One Dinur transformation preserves perfect satisfiability Lemma
- One fixed-alphabet transformation doubles small gaps Lemma
- Powering amplifies a small unsatisfaction gap Lemma
- Powering preserves perfect satisfiability Lemma
- Two-query PCPs and binary constraint graphs Lemma
- Violated-edge positions have controlled collisions Lemma
- Constant-gap binary CSP is NP-hard Theorem
- Fixed-alphabet reduction with constant gap retention Theorem
- The PCP theorem: NP equals PCP(log n, O(1)) Theorem
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Irit Dinur, The PCP theorem by gap amplification; §1.1 Definition1.1 and §1.2 Definition1.2, pp2–3. (standard reference, not scraped)