How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete uniform gap-preserving CSP reductions
Definition
Throughout this page a binary constraint graph is one in the convention of Constraint graph and labeling value: a finite ordinary undirected multigraph with paired incidence slots, a finite nonempty alphabet , one relation per edge in a specified endpoint order, and explicit Boolean relation tables. For an edge set the value is the fraction of ordinary edges satisfied by the labeling , and ; an edgeless graph has value one and unsatisfiability zero, as in the published convention. The explicit encoding of is the list of vertices, the paired incidence slots, the alphabet size and the relation tables; its bit length is the input size of the algorithms below.
Fix an alphabet-size parameter and a degree parameter for the input graphs. A complete uniform gap-preserving reduction with output alphabet , output degree bound , blowup and gap map consists of a deterministic algorithm that, given the explicit encoding of a binary constraint graph over an alphabet with whose underlying graph has all vertex degrees at most , outputs the explicit encoding of a binary constraint graph over the fixed alphabet such that:
- Output shape. Arity stays two, all vertex degrees of are at most , and An edgeless input is mapped to an edgeless output, which therefore has value one.
- Completeness. implies .
- Gap preservation. for every input , where is nondecreasing with and for every .
- Uniformity. runs in time polynomial in the bit length of the explicit input encoding, and the output is explicit. The alphabet , the numbers , and the function depend only on the fixed parameters and on itself, never on or .
The definition asserts no existence statement: it records the interface in which the degree-reduction, powering and assignment-tester steps of this page are stated. Isolated vertices may be deleted from inputs and outputs without changing value or unsatisfiability, so the vertex bound in clause 1 is never needed for padded inputs; the bounded-degree clause and the fixed alphabet keep the explicit encoding length of the output within a constant multiple of plus logarithmic vertex names. Loops count as ordinary edges with two incidences and a relation tested on the repeated label, exactly as published. Monotonicity of is used only to compose gap maps, in Complete linear-blowup reductions compose, never to enlarge an input hypothesis.
Depends on
Used by
- Assignment tester and rejection ratio Definition
- Explicit binary codes of constant rate and distance Definition
- Repeating constraints amplifies the gap False statement
- Complete linear-blowup reductions compose Lemma
- A complete uniform graph gap-amplification step Theorem
- Degree reduction preserves unsatisfaction quantitatively Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Irit Dinur, The PCP theorem by gap amplification, §1.2-§1.3; Definition 1.2, Theorem 1.5 and Lemmas 1.6-1.8, pp. 4-7. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Arora and Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach, §18.5 Definition 18.27 and Lemma 18.28, author-hosted draft. (standard reference, not scraped)