How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Open restrictions of the canonical desingularization
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).
In the setting of Independence of the embedded desingularization from the ambient embedding, let be an open immersion of integral affine -varieties (Open immersions of schemes) and let , be the canonical desingularizations. Then there is an open immersion lifting such that is an isomorphism over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open embedding of affine -varieties of finite type over a field of characteristic zero, with canonical desingularizations and .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed for the canonical-resolution consumer clauses and their cited AC-dependent construction suppliers.
Weak embedded desingularization in characteristic zero, Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms: embedded desingularization commutes with smooth ambient morphisms; an open immersion is étale, hence smooth of relative dimension zero.
Weak embedded desingularization in characteristic zero, Independence of the embedded desingularization from the ambient embedding: the canonical desingularization of an affine variety is obtained by an embedded desingularization in any smooth affine ambient variety and is independent of that choice.
Open immersions of schemes, Locally finite type and finite type morphisms: in the principal case for a regular function ; one may choose a closed embedding into a smooth affine and a function on restricting to , so that is a closed immersion and is an open immersion of smooth affine schemes.
Proof
The principal case. Assume first with . By [F3] choose a smooth affine ambient and with ; the open immersions and are étale, so [F1] gives a canonical identification of the embedded desingularization of in with the restriction of the embedded desingularization of in ; by [F2] this is the required open embedding of the canonical desingularizations over .
The general case. For an arbitrary affine open , the complement is defined by finitely many functions; covering by principal opens contained in and applying step 1.1 to each, the identifications glue because the desingularizations are canonical and their restrictions to the intersections agree by the same argument. This yields an open embedding lifting , with an isomorphism over .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Integral schemes
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Open immersions of schemes
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms
- Independence of the embedded desingularization from the ambient embedding
- Weak embedded desingularization in characteristic zero
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.