Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The order ideals of a finite poset form a distributive lattice under union and intersection

Statement

For a finite poset PP, the order ideals J(P)J(P) form a finite distributive lattice under inclusion. Its meet is intersection, its join is union, its bottom is \varnothing, and its top is PP.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite poset PP and order ideals I,J,KJ(P)I,J,K\in J(P).

[F1]

An order ideal is downward closed, and a distributive lattice satisfies the two distributive identities for meet and join (Lattices, distributive lattices, and order ideals).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The sets IJI\cap J and IJI\cup J are order ideals: if yy belongs to the intersection or union and xyx\le y, downward closure in the relevant ideal puts xx in the same intersection or union.

givenF1
1.2

Set union and intersection satisfy I(JK)=(IJ)(IK)I\cap(J\cup K)=(I\cap J)\cup(I\cap K) and I(JK)=(IJ)(IK)I\cup(J\cap K)=(I\cup J)\cap(I\cup K) element by element.

givenalgebra
2.1

In the inclusion order, IJI\cap J is the greatest lower bound of I,JI,J and IJI\cup J is their least upper bound. Also \varnothing and PP are respectively the least and greatest order ideals.

step 1.1F1
3.1

Thus J(P)J(P) is a distributive lattice with the asserted operations and bounds. It is finite because it is a subcollection of the finite power set of PP.

step 2.1step 1.2F1L1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 50 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources