How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A -free graph on vertices has a homogeneous set of size at least
Statement
If is a -free finite graph with vertices, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A -free graph on vertices.
Every -free graph with more than one vertex admits a partition with such that is a pure pair (Chudnovsky--Scott--Seymour--Spirkl, "Erdos-Hajnal for graphs with no 5-hole", §5 Blockades, sentence immediately preceding Theorem 5.1).
Proof
We prove the stronger inequality. [given] by induction on . The cases and are immediate.
Assume . By [L1], write with and pure. Put. [step 1.1, L1] The induction hypothesis gives and .
If is complete, then. [step 2.1, algebra] and , whence If is anticomplete, then and , and the same calculation gives .
The induction closes. Since. [step 1.1, step 3.1, algebra] , one obtains .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour, and Sophie Spirkl, Erdős-Hajnal for graphs with no 5-hole, §5 (standard reference, not scraped)