How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complex-weight separation of Harish-Chandra characters
Statement
Let be the real span of a finite reduced crystallographic root system , with chosen positive roots , simple roots , Weyl group and root lattice . Extend the pairing complex linearly to . For , call antidominant if for every , and regular if for every root. Then for antidominant , and when is also regular. Here .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite reduced crystallographic root system, a positive system, its Weyl group and root lattice, and a complex weight with .
The simple roots form a basis of and of over ; positive roots have nonnegative simple-root coordinates, and the positive and negative root cones meet only at zero (Finite Weyl root system, lattice and chamber conventions, Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections).
Move by an element of into the closed positive chamber and let . Its stabilizer is the parabolic Weyl group generated by the reflections with . The root subsystem generated by these simple roots has root lattice and span . Then because the simple roots are a -basis of . Every root of is perpendicular to . These conclusions follow from Finite Weyl closed chambers and stabilizers and the simple-root basis.
For the dual root system, the affine Weyl group is acting by translations and finite Weyl transformations. Its alcoves are simply transitive under this action, and the affine walls have equations with (Coroot and dual root system, Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices, Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function).
In a finite crystallographic root system, a reduced word has positive prefix roots for every (Finite Weyl strong exchange and deletion, Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections).
Proof
Suppose . Since is real, , so . Move into the closed positive chamber and conjugate by the same Weyl element; lattice membership is preserved. With and as in [F2], , and each generator of fixes . Therefore ; since , [F2] gives . The affine transformation of the affine Weyl group of the dual subsystem fixes the orthogonal projection of to .
In any locally finite affine root-wall arrangement, the stabilizer of a point is generated by the reflections in walls through that point. To see this, choose a ball about meeting no wall not containing . Inside it, the finitely many hyperplanes through cut local chambers; generic line segments join any two local chambers by crossing one wall at a time and avoiding their codimension-two intersections. The corresponding wall reflections therefore act transitively on the local chambers. If an affine Weyl element fixes , choose a local chamber and a product of these reflections carrying to its image. Then preserves the global alcove containing , so it is the identity by the simple transitivity in [F3]. Hence . Apply this to from [step 1.1] in the arrangement for the dual subsystem . Every generating wall has a root and ; because is in , [F2] gives , so . Taking finite parts shows that belongs to the subgroup generated by the reflections for roots with integral -pairing. Undo now the temporary Weyl conjugation of step 1.1: if that conjugating element was , a generating root in the conjugated coordinates returns to , and . Thus the original lies in the integral-root reflection subgroup for the original . From this point on and refer to the original data. No preservation of antidominance or of the positive cone by is assumed.
The set is stable under its root reflections: if and , then using crystallographic integrality. It is therefore a finite root system in its span, with positive system and its own simple roots . For every , antidominance makes the integer nonpositive. If is reduced in , telescoping gives Every prefix root is positive in by [F4], hence is positive in the ambient system; every term lies in . Thus . If is regular, every integral pairing here is nonzero, so every coefficient is strictly negative.
Combining [step 1.1] and [step 3.1], an assumed also lies in , contradicting [F1]. This proves the antidominant assertion. If is regular, every integral root pairing in [step 3.1] is strictly negative. For any nonidentity , its reduced word has at least one term, and each term is a strictly negative integer multiple of a positive root; the sum is nonzero because is pointed. Hence forces , proving the regular assertion.
Depends on
- Coroot and dual root system
- Finite Weyl root system, lattice and chamber conventions
- Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices
- Finite Weyl closed chambers and stabilizers
- Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections
- Finite Weyl strong exchange and deletion
- Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Masaki Kashiwara, Representation theory and D-modules on flag varieties, Astérisque 173–174 (1989) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, MIT 18.757 (2023) (standard reference, not scraped)