Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex-weight separation of Harish-Chandra characters

Statement

Let E be the real span of a finite reduced crystallographic root system Φ, with chosen positive roots Φ+, simple roots Δ={α1,…,αr}, Weyl group W and root lattice Q=∑iZαi. Extend the pairing complex linearly to EC. For κ∈EC, call κ antidominant if ⟨κ,α∨⟩∉Z>0 for every α∈Φ+, and regular if ⟨κ,α∨⟩≠0 for every root. Then κ−wκ∉Q+∖{0}(w∈W) for antidominant κ, and κ−wκ∉Q+(w≠1) when κ is also regular. Here Q+=∑iZ≥0αi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite reduced crystallographic root system, a positive system, its Weyl group and root lattice, and a complex weight κ=a+ib with a,b∈E.

[F1]

The simple roots form a basis of E and of Q over Z; positive roots have nonnegative simple-root coordinates, and the positive and negative root cones meet only at zero (Finite Weyl root system, lattice and chamber conventions, Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections).

[F2]

Move b by an element of W into the closed positive chamber and let I={i:(b,αi)=0}. Its stabilizer is the parabolic Weyl group WI generated by the reflections si with i∈I. The root subsystem ΦI generated by these simple roots has root lattice QI=∑i∈IZαi and span EI=span⁡R{αi:i∈I}. Then Q∩span⁡R{αi:i∈I}=∑i∈IZαi, because the simple roots are a Z-basis of Q. Every root of ΦI is perpendicular to b. These conclusions follow from Finite Weyl closed chambers and stabilizers and the simple-root basis.

[F3]

For the dual root system, the affine Weyl group is Q⋊W acting by translations and finite Weyl transformations. Its alcoves are simply transitive under this action, and the affine walls have equations ⟨x,α∨⟩=m with m∈Z (Coroot and dual root system, Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices, Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function).

[F4]

In a finite crystallographic root system, a reduced word w=si1⋯sim has positive prefix roots si1⋯sij−1αij for every j (Finite Weyl strong exchange and deletion, Finite Weyl positive roots and simple reflections).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3given

Suppose q=κ−wκ∈Q. Since q is real, b=wb, so w∈Wb. Move b into the closed positive chamber and conjugate a,b,κ,w,q by the same Weyl element; lattice membership is preserved. With I and EI as in [F2], w∈WI, and each generator of WI fixes EI⊥. Therefore a−wa∈EI; since q=a−wa∈Q, [F2] gives q∈QI=Q∩EI. The affine transformation tqw of the affine Weyl group QI⋊WI of the dual subsystem ΦI∨ fixes the orthogonal projection aI of a to EI.

2.1F2F3step 1.1construct

In any locally finite affine root-wall arrangement, the stabilizer of a point aI is generated by the reflections in walls through that point. To see this, choose a ball about aI meeting no wall not containing aI. Inside it, the finitely many hyperplanes through aI cut local chambers; generic line segments join any two local chambers by crossing one wall at a time and avoiding their codimension-two intersections. The corresponding wall reflections therefore act transitively on the local chambers. If an affine Weyl element fixes aI, choose a local chamber C and a product h of these reflections carrying C to its image. Then h−1g preserves the global alcove containing C, so it is the identity by the simple transitivity in [F3]. Hence g=h. Apply this to g=tqw from [step 1.1] in the arrangement for the dual subsystem ΦI∨. Every generating wall has a root α∈ΦI and ⟨a,α∨⟩∈Z; because α is in ΦI, [F2] gives ⟨b,α∨⟩=0, so ⟨κ,α∨⟩∈Z. Taking finite parts shows that w belongs to the subgroup Wint generated by the reflections sα for roots with integral κ-pairing. Undo now the temporary Weyl conjugation of step 1.1: if that conjugating element was u, a generating root α in the conjugated coordinates returns to u−1α, and ⟨uκ,α∨⟩=⟨κ,(u−1α)∨⟩. Thus the original w lies in the integral-root reflection subgroup for the original κ. From this point on κ,w,q,Φ+ and Q+ refer to the original data. No preservation of antidominance or of the positive cone by u is assumed.

3.1F1F4step 2.1algebra

The set Φint={α∈Φ:⟨κ,α∨⟩∈Z} is stable under its root reflections: if m=⟨κ,α∨⟩∈Z and β∈Φint, then ⟨κ,(sαβ)∨⟩=⟨sακ,β∨⟩=⟨κ,β∨⟩−m⟨α,β∨⟩∈Z, using crystallographic integrality. It is therefore a finite root system in its span, with positive system Φint∩Φ+ and its own simple roots Δint. For every δ∈Δint, antidominance makes the integer ⟨κ,δ∨⟩ nonpositive. If w=sδ1⋯sδm is reduced in Wint, telescoping gives κ−wκ=∑j=1m⟨κ,δj∨⟩sδ1⋯sδj−1δj. Every prefix root is positive in Φint by [F4], hence is positive in the ambient system; every term lies in −Q+. Thus q∈−Q+. If κ is regular, every integral pairing here is nonzero, so every coefficient is strictly negative.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Combining [step 1.1] and [step 3.1], an assumed q∈Q+∖{0} also lies in −Q+, contradicting [F1]. This proves the antidominant assertion. If κ is regular, every integral root pairing in [step 3.1] is strictly negative. For any nonidentity w∈Wint, its reduced word has at least one term, and each term is a strictly negative integer multiple of a positive root; the sum is nonzero because Q+ is pointed. Hence q=0 forces w=1, proving the regular assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources