Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Modal trace bound and continuity of the exact-DtN variational form

Statement

Fix 0<a<R, k>0, and let Va,R and ak,a,R be as in Exact-DtN truncated modal variational formulation. There is C=C(a,R,k) such that for every u,v∈Va,R, ∑ℓ≥0(1+ℓ)(∥uℓ(a)∥22+∥uℓ(R)∥22)≤C∥u∥V2,∣ak,a,R(u,v)∣≤C∥u∥V∥v∥V. In particular, the defining traces and boundary pairing are finite, the form is continuous, Va,R is a Hilbert direct sum, and finite-degree truncations converge in its norm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The annulus 0<a<R, fixed k>0, and the energy space and form [F1].

[F1]

Exact-DtN truncated modal variational formulation: uℓ∈H1((a,R);Hℓ) with squared energy weighted by r2 and 1+ℓ(ℓ+1); the boundary coefficient satisfies τℓ=khℓ′(kR)/hℓ(kR).

[F2]

The spherical modal DtN map is well-defined and exact for smooth data: for fixed k,R, ∣τℓ∣≤k+(ℓ+1)/R.

Proof

Given: u,v∈Va,R and [F1]–[F2].

1.1F1algebra

Each H1((a,R);Hℓ) is complete because Hℓ is finite dimensional. A Cauchy sequence in the weighted square-sum norm is Cauchy in each coordinate; take its coordinatewise H1 limits. For every finite number of coordinates the squared norm of the limit is bounded by the liminf of the sequence norms, so the coordinatewise limit has finite total norm; applying the same argument to differences shows convergence in the sum norm. Tails of the defining convergent nonnegative series tend to zero, so finite-degree truncations are dense. For any scalar or finite-dimensional Hilbert-valued w∈H1(a,R), set A=∥w∥L2(a,R) and B=∥w′∥L2(a,R). Absolute continuity and ∣w(R)∣2−∣w(t)∣2=2Re⁡∫tR⟨w′(s),w(s)⟩ds give, after averaging t over [a,R] and applying Cauchy–Schwarz, ∥w(R)∥2≤(R−a)−1A2+2AB. Multiplying by 1+ℓ and using 2(1+ℓ)AB≤(1+ℓ)2A2+B2, (1+ℓ)2≤2(1+ℓ(ℓ+1)), and B2≤a−2∫aRr2∥w′∥2dr gives (1+ℓ)∥w(R)∥2≤Ca,R∫aR(r2∥w′∥2+(1+ℓ(ℓ+1))∥w∥2)dr. Replacing r by a+R−r proves the same inequality at the inner endpoint. Summing with w=uℓ proves the weighted trace estimate.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The volume terms of a are bounded by a constant times ∥u∥V∥v∥V because r lies in [a,R] and k is fixed. By [F2], ∣τℓ∣≤Ck,R(1+ℓ). Cauchy–Schwarz over degrees and the trace estimate from step 1.1 give ∑ℓ∣τℓ⟨uℓ(R),vℓ(R)⟩∣≤C(∑ℓ(1+ℓ)∥uℓ(R)∥22)1/2(∑ℓ(1+ℓ)∥vℓ(R)∥22)1/2≤C∥u∥V∥v∥V. Thus the boundary series is absolutely convergent and the whole form is continuous.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Exact-DtN truncated modal variational formulation.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources