Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Period is constant on communicating classes

Statement

If x and y communicate, then d(x)=d(y), including x=y and the convention d(x)=0 when no positive return exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A countable transition matrix p and communicating states x,y.

[F1]

Communication means x→y and y→x, where accessibility is witnessed by some n∈N0 with p(n)(x,y)>0. Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility

[F2]

Rx={n≥1:p(n)(x,x)>0}; d(x)=0 if Rx=∅, and otherwise d(x) is the greatest positive integer dividing every element of Rx. Period of a state

[F3]

For m,n≥0, p(m+n)(u,v)=∑z∈Ep(m)(u,z)p(n)(z,v). Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations

[F4]

p(0)(u,v)=1{u=v}. Transition matrices and n-step probabilities

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F4given

If x=y, the conclusion is the identity d(x)=d(x), whether or not Rx is empty. Suppose x≠y. By [F1], choose route lengths r,s∈N0 with p(r)(x,y)>0 and p(s)(y,x)>0. By [F4], neither length is zero, so r,s≥1. Twice applying [F3] and retaining the route terms gives p(r+s)(x,x)≥p(r)(x,y)p(s)(y,x)>0 and p(r+s)(y,y)≥p(s)(y,x)p(r)(x,y)>0. Thus both return-time sets are nonempty and both periods are positive.

2.1F2F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Fix any t∈Rx. By [F3], the route from y to x, a t-step return at x, and the route from x to y give p(s+t+r)(y,y)≥p(s)(y,x)p(t)(x,x)p(r)(x,y)>0. Step 1.1 also shows r+s∈Ry. Hence the positive integer d(y) divides both r+s and r+t+s, so it divides their difference t. As this holds for every t∈Rx, d(y) is a common positive divisor of Rx and therefore d(y)≤d(x) by [F2].

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Interchanging x and y in step 2.1 shows that every t∈Ry is divisible by d(x); hence d(x) is a common positive divisor of Ry and d(x)≤d(y). Together with step 2.1 this proves equality for distinct communicating states. The case x=y was settled in step 1.1.

4.1F1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1given∎

If E=∅, there are no communicating states and the assertion is vacuous. If x=y and there is no positive return, both sides equal the stipulated zero; if x≠y communicate, step 1.1 proves positive returns exist, so neither period is zero. One-state, deterministic, and absorbing cases are covered by the same alternatives. The accessibility witnesses are positive for distinct states because [F4] makes a zero-step transition possible only from a state to itself. The proof chooses routes only for this fixed pair, so it uses no choice function. This one-way equality statement is not an iff.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources