Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Whole-star smooth embeddings are stable under strong piecewise C1 approximation

Statement

Let K be finite and f:K→Rq a whole-star smooth immersion in the sense of Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting. There is δ>0 such that every strong piecewise C1 δ-approximation g:K′→Rq, on any finite subdivision K′, is a whole-star immersion. If f is also an embedding, δ may be chosen so that g is an embedding. The subdivision need not have a mesh or shape bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite geometric simplicial complex K with Euclidean realization in some RN, a whole-star smooth immersion f:K→Rq, a finite subdivision K′ of K and a strong piecewise C1 δ-approximation g:K′→Rq (Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting).

[F1]

Whole-star condition and approximation contract: f is piecewise smooth with dfb injective on the tangent star at every b, the restriction of f to each closed simplex is smooth, and g is piecewise smooth on K′ with sup⁡b∣g(b)−f(b)∣<δ and ∣dgb(v)−dfb(v)∣<δ∣v∣ for every b and every nonzero tangent-star vector v (Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting). In particular g is continuous, and the differentials on the tangent cones agree on common faces and vary continuously with the base point.

[F2]

Compactness and minima (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, A closed subset of a compact metric space is compact): a subset of Rm, m≥1, is compact exactly when it is closed and bounded; closed simplices, unit spheres in linear subspaces, and products of two such closed bounded sets are closed and bounded in the relevant Rm, hence compact, so every continuous real function on them attains a minimum; the realization ∣K∣, its square ∣K∣2 (a closed bounded subset of R2N) and closed subsets of these are compact; and a continuous bijection from a compact metric space onto a metric space is a homeomorphism onto its image (A continuous bijection from a compact metric space onto a metric space carries open sets to open sets, so its inverse is continuous).

[F3]

Vector fundamental theorem of calculus (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz): if φ:[0,1]→Rq is C1, then φ(1)−φ(0)=∫01φ′. It applies to s↦G(c+sh) along a segment [c,c+h] lying in a single simplex on which G is C1.

[F4]

Angle arithmetic: for nonzero vectors V,W,W′ one has angle⁡(V,W′)≤angle⁡(V,W)+angle⁡(W,W′); and if ∣V∣≥μ∣v∣ while ∣W−V∣<δ∣v∣ with δ<μ/2, then angle⁡(V,W)≤4δ/μ. Both are elementary estimates for the Euclidean angle of nonzero vectors.

[F5]

Disjoint faces have disjoint affine hulls: if η,τ are disjoint faces of a simplex with affinely independent vertices, then aff⁡(η)∩aff⁡(τ)=∅; indeed an equality ∑iλivi=∑jμjwj of affine combinations with ∑iλi=∑jμj=1 is a vanishing affine relation among the affinely independent vertices, forcing all coefficients to vanish and contradicting both sums being 1.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4algebra

Uniform rank bound. If K has only vertices, immersion is automatic and a sufficiently small value error preserves the finite separation of distinct embedded vertices; the empty case is vacuous. Otherwise, for each positive-dimensional original simplex σ let Dσ be its direction space. Its tangent cone at b∈σ spans Dσ and every vector of Dσ is a difference of two cone vectors, so whole-star injectivity makes Ab,σ:=D(f∣σ)(b) injective on Dσ. Compactness of σ times its unit sphere gives a common least singular value μ>0 over all original simplices. The strong derivative bound also holds, with ≤δ, on the entire direction space of each refined simplex: apply the bound at its relative interior points, where every direction is tangent, then pass to its boundary by continuity. Thus D(g∣s)(b) has least singular value at least μ−δ on every refined simplex s, and derivative errors less than μ/2 give angle errors at most 4δ/μ by [F4].

1.2F3F4algebra

Two-segment separation. Suppose two segments have common endpoint x and a simplexwise affine injective map H carries their outward directions to nonzero vectors making angle β>0. In their image plane project onto the oriented line perpendicular to the internal bisector, or onto the image line when β=π. The two projected directions have opposite signs. Any nonzero derivative making angle less than β/2 with its corresponding image direction has the same strict projection sign. Segment integration then makes the projected map strictly monotone along each segment and puts their open images on opposite sides of the image of x, so the map is injective on their union. This also applies to a finite piecewise smooth subdivision of the segments: integrate on each subsegment and add.

1.3F2F5algebra

Geometric separation. For two geometric simplices σ1,σ2 with common face τ proper in both, let c be the barycentre of τ and η the opposite face of σ1. For p=(1−t)x+ty, x∈τ, y∈η, set X(p)=(1−t)x+tc, taking X(p)=c when t=1 and X(p)=p on τ. This is a continuous projection fixing τ, and p−X(p)=t(y−c). The unit directions of σ2−c form a compact set: in barycentric direction coordinates the cone is given by zero sum and nonnegative coordinates at vertices outside τ, hence is closed. No ray y−c with y∈η has a direction in this cone, since a common ray would either put y in τ or put y in aff⁡(τ), contrary to [F5]. Therefore the angle between those directions has a positive minimum. For q∈σ2 the vector q−X(p) belongs to that cone, because c−X(p) lies in the direction space of τ, the lineality space of the cone. This proves the same lower angle bound for the two rays from X(p) to p and q, when both are nonzero. The projection formula is preserved by separate affine injections of the two simplices agreeing on τ, provided their image intersection is exactly the image of τ.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.3algebra

Uniform frozen angles. For b∈τ define the frozen map on each simplex containing b by Hb(x)=Ab,σ(x−b). This is simplexwise affine, agrees on common faces, and is injective on their union by the whole-star hypothesis. Its image simplices therefore intersect exactly in Hb(τ). Apply step 1.3 to these image simplices. Their separation angle has a positive minimum uniformly over b∈τ: use the fixed compact sets y∈η and unit directions z of σ2−c, and minimize the continuous angle between Ab,σ1(y−c) and Ab,σ2z on their product with τ. Neither vector vanishes by step 1.1, and a zero angle is excluded by the image intersection property. The finite minimum over all ordered original simplex pairs, capped at π/2, gives α>0; take α=π/2 if there are no such pairs. No single linear extension of Hb to the span of two simplices is asserted.

3.1F1F4step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1choose

Local estimates independent of the subdivision. Choose δ<μ/2 with 4δ/μ<α/8. For each b, choose a small relative ball Ub meeting only original simplices containing b. Continuity of their finitely many derivative fields makes the angle between D(f∣σ)(c)h and Ab,σh less than α/8 for c∈Ub∩σ and every nonzero direction h∈Dσ. Step 1.1 and [F4] give angle less than α/4 between each refined derivative of g along h and Ab,σh. This bound holds on subdivided segments, including their one-sided derivatives. Shrink to a ball Vb so that for any two original simplices containing b, the projection in step 1.3 sends Vb∩σ1 into Ub; there are only finitely many projections and each fixes b. The two segments joining points of Vb through that projection lie in Ub, since its intersections with simplices are convex. These neighbourhoods depend on f and K, not on g or its subdivision.

4.1step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1step 1.2step 3.1

Local injectivity and immersion. For distinct p,q∈Vb in one original simplex, join them through their midpoint; their frozen outward rays are antiparallel. Otherwise use their minimal original carriers and the projection of step 1.3 onto their common face; both carriers contain b, and their frozen rays make angle at least α by step 2.1. If one segment is trivial, the other alone has a strictly monotone projection. In all cases steps 1.2 and 3.1 give g(p)≠g(q). To check immersion at b, apply the same argument to the frozen piecewise linear map Jb(x)=dgb(x−b) on the refined tangent fan. Scale any two star vectors until their endpoints lie in Vb and in the closed star of b in the subdivision. On every refined cone the derivative of Jb is D(g∣s)(b), whose angle from the appropriate Ab,σ is less than α/8 by step 1.1; the projected paths stay in the original cones containing b and may be split across the finitely many refined cones. Step 1.2 separates their endpoints exactly as above. Hence dgb is injective on the entire tangent star, for every b, proving immersion.

5.1F1F2step 3.1step 4.1∎

Global embedding. If f is an embedding, take a finite subcover Vb1,…,Vbm of ∣K∣ and put C=∣K∣2∖⋃i(Vbi×Vbi). This compact set misses the diagonal, so ∣f(p)−f(q)∣ has a positive minimum η on it; if it is empty omit this bound. Require also δ<η/3. On C, ∣g(p)−g(q)∣>η−2δ>0, and outside C distinct points are separated by step 4.1. Thus g is continuous and injective on a compact space, hence a homeomorphism onto its image by [F2]; together with immersion this is an embedding. The same δ works for every finite subdivision, with no shape or mesh restriction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources