Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Planar FMM lists partition all ordered off-diagonal particle pairs

Statement

For a finite quadtree and a nonempty root pair as in Finite planar quadtree and separated interaction lists, the recursive interaction decomposition terminates. The Cartesian pair sets IC×ID of its far cell pairs, together with its direct near particle pairs, are pairwise disjoint and partition {(j,i)∈I×I:j≠i}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite quadtree with its source/target labels, the recursive pair rule, and distinct positions for distinct labels.

[F1]

Finite planar quadtree and separated interaction lists: each internal cell's four child cells partition its labels; the recursive rule either records a separated cell pair, records the off-diagonal pairs in two leaves directly, or replaces a cell pair by its nonempty child-pair partition.

Proof

1.1givenF1induction

For a cell C let h(C) be its remaining tree height, and for a pair (C,D) use h(C)+h(D). Every nonterminal call split by [F1] selects a nonleaf cell (both coordinates when C=D); each child call strictly lowers the height of every split coordinate and leaves any unsplit coordinate fixed. The measure is a nonnegative integer, so every branch terminates. The recursion is finitely branching (at most sixteen child pairs at a simultaneous equal-cell split), hence its finite-depth recursion tree is finite.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

If the source cell is split, its child label sets are disjoint and cover the source labels, so the child Cartesian products are a disjoint cover of IC×ID. The same statement holds when the target cell is split. When C=D is internal, splitting both ordered coordinates gives all ordered child products, also disjoint. Thus each recursive replacement preserves exactly the parent pair set.

3.1F1step 2.1induction

A terminal far cell pair records its entire Cartesian product IC×ID. A terminal near pair of leaves records exactly that product with the diagonal labels removed. By step 2.1, induction from the root pair shows these terminal records cover the off-diagonal part of the root product without overlap.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra∎

A far cell pair has disjoint circumscribed disks because RCD>aC+aD; hence its label sets cannot intersect and its product contains no diagonal pair. Removing the diagonal only at terminal leaf pairs therefore leaves exactly all ordered pairs (j,i) with j≠i, each once.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources