How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Three-dimensional Laplace spherical-harmonic addition theorem
Statement
For every integer , the space of Degree-indexed spherical harmonic spaces in three dimensions has dimension . For any orthonormal basis , there is a basis-independent normalized zonal polynomial such that It obeys for and the generating identity
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit sphere, surface measure, inner product, and homogeneous harmonic polynomial spaces of Degree-indexed spherical harmonic spaces in three dimensions.
Degree-indexed spherical harmonic spaces in three dimensions: consists of restrictions of homogeneous degree- polynomials annihilated by the three-dimensional Laplacian, with inner product and total sphere area .
Proof
Let be the homogeneous degree- polynomials in three variables; it has monomials. For a homogeneous polynomial of degree , direct differentiation and Euler's identity give . If , put , , , , and for . For , the degree- polynomial satisfies : the coefficients of telescope by and , and . Hence is onto; for the target is zero.
Restriction of a homogeneous polynomial to is injective, because homogeneity recovers its value at every nonzero from its value at . Rank-nullity therefore gives for , and direct counting gives and for . Gram-Schmidt on any finite spanning list gives an orthonormal basis; no choice axiom is used.
For an orthonormal basis define . A unitary basis change leaves this sum unchanged, and rotations carry one orthonormal basis of to another, so is rotation-invariant. Thus is constant in ; integrating it over the sphere gives , so this constant is .
Fix . After rotating it to the third coordinate axis, use and . A rotation sends these to and , so an invariant monomial must have . The invariant homogeneous polynomials are therefore sums of , whose restrictions to the sphere are polynomials of degree at most , with . The polar-coordinate Laplacian is ; applying it to gives . For a zonal , the angular term is by , so . Writing yields . For , the equation at , using , gives ; descending through forces every coefficient of parity opposite to to vanish. For , the coefficient is positive, so each lower coefficient of parity is determined by the next one. Thus the zonal solution space has dimension at most one (for it is the constants). The function is a zonal harmonic, and , so a nonzero such solution exists. Define when . Rotation invariance makes this depend only on , and . The diagonal value in step 3.1 now gives the displayed addition theorem.
Cauchy-Schwarz applied to the finite basis sum gives . Dividing by the diagonal constant proves .
Fix and let for . The radial formula away from shows is harmonic in the unit ball. Its homogeneous Taylor term of degree is therefore harmonic, since the homogeneous terms in of each degree vanish separately; it is also invariant under rotations fixing . By step 4.1 it has the form . On the ray , , so coefficient comparison gives . Finally , whose Taylor series in has radius at least : its possible denominator zeros are , both of modulus one. This proves the generating identity for .
Depends on
Used by
- Single-cluster three-dimensional Laplace multipole evaluator Algorithm
- Exact modal Dirichlet-to-Neumann map on a sphere Definition
- Spherical harmonic modes are orthogonal, complete for continuous data, and have polynomial evaluation bounds Lemma
- Three-dimensional Laplace cluster expansion error and work Theorem
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael O’Neil, Integral Equations and Fast Algorithms, complete course lecture notes (2017) (standard reference, not scraped)
- James Demmel, Fast Hierarchical Methods for the N-body Problem, Part 2, CS267 Lecture 25 (1996) (standard reference, not scraped)