Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The highest derivative of a polynomial

Statement

Let m∈N, m≥1, and let p:R→R be the evaluation function of a formal real polynomial of degree at most m, or the zero polynomial. Write its actual coefficient list through its degree and extend that list by zeros to a0,…,am (all zero for the zero polynomial); this is an evaluation vector, not a change to the formal polynomial object. Define iterated derivatives as in Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞ and write m!R:=∏j<m(j+1), with each natural factor read as its canonical real image under The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field. Then p(m)(x)=amm!R for every x∈R. In particular, this derivative is zero if deg⁡p<m, and it is m!R if p is monic of degree m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number m≥1 and the evaluation function and padded coefficient vector of a formal polynomial of degree at most m, or of the zero polynomial with its all-zero evaluation vector.

[F1]

Formal real polynomials, evaluation, degree, leading coefficient, and monic polynomials: a nonzero formal real polynomial is a finite coefficient list with nonzero final coefficient, and its evaluation is the corresponding finite sum of coefficients times powers. The zero polynomial is a separate formal object with no degree.

[F2]

Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: p(0)=p and, wherever p(r) is differentiable, p(r+1)=(p(r))′.

[F4]

The principle of mathematical induction: a property true at 0 and inherited by successors holds for every natural number.

[F5]

The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field: a natural number used as a real scalar denotes its canonical real image; the image of a successor is the image of its predecessor plus 1.

[F6]

The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N: the full falling product m(m−1)⋯1 is the natural factorial m!, which is also the natural product ∏j<m(j+1).

[F7]

Laws of finite sums and products in N, and ι(∑k<nak)=∑k<nι(ak): the canonical real image of a finite natural product is the corresponding product of real images, so the product representation of m! in [F6] becomes the stated m!R.

Proof

1.1givenF1F5construct

For a nonzero formal polynomial, [F1] gives p(X)=∑k=0makXk, since zero padding adds only zero terms. For the zero polynomial, p≡0 and the given evaluation vector is all zero, so the same identity holds without representing the formal object by a coefficient list. For 0≤r≤m, define the real function Qr(X)=∑k=rmak(∏s=0r−1(k−s))Xk−r, with the empty product equal to 1; each factor k−s is natural because k≥r>s.

2.1basegivenstep 1.1F2F3F7ihalgebra

At r=0, Q0=p=p(0) by [F2]. If r<m and p(r)=Qr, termwise differentiation in [F3] kills the k=r constant term and multiplies each term with k>r by its exponent k−r; for each k>r, the resulting real coefficient is ak(∏s=0r−1(k−s))(k−r)=ak∏s=0r(k−s). Indeed the finite natural product extends by its last factor, and [F7] carries that natural identity to the product of canonical real images. The new exponent is (k−r)−1=k−(r+1), so the differentiated sum is exactly Qr+1. Hence p(r+1)=Qr+1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F4ihdischarge-induction

Apply [F4] to the property P(r) that r≤m implies p(r)=Qr. Step 2.1 proves P(0). If P(r) holds and r+1≤m, then r<m and step 2.1 proves p(r+1)=Qr+1; if r+1>m, P(r+1) is vacuous. Thus P(m) holds.

4.1step 3.1givenF6F7discharge-inductionalgebra∎

At r=m, the sum defining Qm contains only k=m and equals am∏s=0m−1(m−s)=amm!R: [F6] identifies the natural falling product with m!, and [F7] carries it to the real product in the statement. This proves the stated derivative and both special cases.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources