How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Primitive pairs define unique unoriented slopes on a torus
Statement
Let be an oriented torus and let be an ordered basis of . An unoriented essential simple closed curve on has homology class for a unique pair up to simultaneous sign, and that pair is primitive: . Conversely, every primitive pair determines an essential simple closed curve, unique up to isotopy and simultaneous reversal of orientation.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An oriented torus and an ordered integral basis of its first homology.
Identify with so the coordinate loops represent and ; the chosen basis fixes this coordinate convention.
External input (bigon lift criterion). If two transverse simple closed curves on a surface have a pair of lifts to the universal cover intersecting more than once, the curves form an embedded bigon. The innermost-disk construction makes its interior disjoint from the curves. This is the contrapositive of Lemma 1.8, including its embedded projection argument, in Farb–Margalit, A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, version 5.0, printed pp.32–33; Proposition 1.7 on p.31 is the bigon criterion. Farb–Margalit
Proof
Let satisfy . Bézout's identity gives with . The matrix with columns and lies in , so it induces a homeomorphism of . The image of the first coordinate circle is embedded, essential, and represents . Reversing its parameter negates both coefficients, so the unoriented curve is unchanged.
If is an essential simple closed curve on , it is nonseparating; cutting along it gives an annulus. An arc joining the two annulus boundary circles closes to a simple curve meeting once, so the algebraic intersection is . Writing and gives because the ordered basis has intersection form . Any common divisor of would divide , so .
Suppose are essential simple closed curves whose primitive classes agree up to sign. Reverse one orientation if necessary so their classes agree, and isotope them to be transverse. Let be their common primitive class in the coordinates of [A1]. If they intersect, choose lifts through one lift of an intersection point. Each chosen lift is preserved by the same nonzero deck translation , because its projected curve represents . Hence both and lie on this pair of lifts and are distinct. By [F1] the curves therefore form an embedded bigon in whose interior misses them. Isotoping one curve across this bigon removes exactly two intersections and creates none. The transverse intersection set is finite, so repetition terminates and makes the curves disjoint. Cutting along gives an annulus, and the disjoint essential curve is parallel to its core, so the two curves cobound a subannulus. Isotopy across that annulus carries to . Thus the primitive class modulo simultaneous sign determines exactly one unoriented isotopy class.
Diagram
Each unit grid square is a fundamental domain for ; the bold -by- rectangle is a display window containing two such squares. The red segment joins to its exact lattice translate , so its lattice translates project to one simple closed curve because . The blue arrows mark the and lattice directions. This picture illustrates one primitive pair; the proof establishes the claim for every pair.
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- William P. Thurston, The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Danny Calegari, Kleinian Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Benson Farb and Dan Margalit, A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, version 5.0 author draft (standard reference, not scraped)