How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Degree-one evaluation for a principal degree-zero boundary ideal
Statement
Let be an associative unital ring with and no zero divisors, embedded as a unital subring in a division ring , put as a right -module, and let be a right -module chain complex concentrated in nonnegative degrees. Supply an identification . If the right ideal is principal, restriction to cycles gives an isomorphism Neither a principal ideal domain hypothesis on nor a choice principle is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The specified complex and division-ring embedding. Put , , and for one generator .
Proof
A degree-one cocycle is a map vanishing on , and a coboundary is a map of the form . Restriction of a cocycle to descends to ; coboundaries restrict to zero. Thus restriction defines the stated map. If , then and all coboundaries vanish, so the map is already an isomorphism.
Suppose . Choose with . Because has no zero divisors, , , is well-defined and a section of . Hence . Any map pulls back to a map on vanishing on and extends by zero on to a degree-one cocycle. This proves surjectivity.
If a degree-one cocycle restricts to zero on , it factors as for a right-linear map . Let with and put . Then in . The right-linear map , , extends , since . The cocycle is consequently the coboundary . This proves injectivity and the result. All selections comprise one ideal generator, one lift and one fraction representative.
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Cochran, Orr and Teichner, Knot concordance, Whitney towers and L2-signatures, degree-one evaluation in the proof of Theorem 2.13 (standard reference, not scraped)