How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subgroup group-ring extension and fraction quotients
Statement
Let be a commutative unital ring and a subgroup. Set . Extension on right modules is exact and faithful, and for each right -module the map is split injective as an -module map. For every right- chain complex , without a boundedness or finiteness assumption, there is the natural isomorphism The corresponding left-module assertions hold with the tensor factors reversed.
Suppose additionally that and have , no zero divisors and both Ore conditions, and are embedded in their right-fraction division rings and , respectively. Then the inclusion extends uniquely to an injective ring map . Under this identification, All assertions require no choice principle, including when is infinite. No splitting of a group extension is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group rings and, for the second clause only, the supplied Ore division rings. Group-ring elements are finite formal -linear combinations of group elements.
A tensor product is the group on pairs modulo additivity and balancing relations; every tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors. The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums
The homology of a chain complex is its cycles modulo its boundaries. Homology object of a chain complex
Proof
For a finite set of left cosets , let be the subgroup of consisting of sums supported on those cosets. It is a left -submodule, and dropping all coefficients outside those cosets defines a left- linear projection splitting inclusion. A finite choice of representatives gives the explicit left- isomorphism , : the supports of distinct summands are disjoint, and translating a supported sum by proves surjectivity and uniqueness. Only representatives of this finite set of cosets are used; no global representative system is chosen. Every finite set of elements of lies in some such , by taking the finitely many cosets that meet their supports.
For the fraction clause, send , with and , to the same expression in . If also in , choose a nonzero common right multiple in . Multiplying on the right by gives in , and the same identity in proves equality there. Thus the map is well-defined. At a common denominator the addition formula is in both division rings. For a product with , choose nonzero in . Then and the product is in both rings; the case is immediate. Hence the map preserves multiplication, addition and unit. Its kernel is zero, since implies in and hence in . Uniqueness follows because a ring map extending must send the inverse of each nonzero to its inverse in .
Let be injective. A tensor lies in the image of for a finite , by [F1] and step 1.1. If , apply to see that its representative maps to zero in . The explicit finite-free coordinates of step 1.1 identify this map with a finite direct sum of copies of , so and . For arbitrary maps exact at , the same finite projection sends a tensor in into a finite direct sum of copies of . Lifting its finitely many coordinates gives a tensor in the image of . Conversely that image lies in the kernel since . A surjective map also remains surjective, by lifting the finitely many first coordinates of a tensor expression. Thus extension is exact for arbitrary right modules.
Dropping all coefficients outside defines an -bimodule map with : multiplication by a group element of on either side preserves both and its complement. Balancing therefore defines , . It is right- linear and satisfies . This proves the split unit assertion. If for a module homomorphism , then for each ; the functor is faithful. Apply step 2.1 to the exact sequences defining cycles, boundaries and their quotient. It identifies tensor cycles with the kernel of the tensor differential, tensor boundaries with its image, and the tensor quotient with their quotient. The resulting map is , proving the natural homology assertion degree by degree. Replacing left cosets by right cosets gives the same finite-coordinate proof for left modules, and the same coefficient projection splits their unit map.
Suppose . Write with , , so . Partition the finite support of into right cosets and choose finitely many representatives, using for the coset if it occurs. Thus with . Right multiplication by preserves each of these coset supports. Since is supported on , every summand outside that coset satisfies as a group-ring element. The absence of zero divisors in and imply for each such summand. Therefore is supported on , which means . The reverse inclusion is given, so . The map of additive quotients is well-defined, has kernel , and respects both actions because all inclusions are ring maps. Every representative, denominator, lift and coordinate set in this proof belongs to a single finite argument; no simultaneous infinite family is selected. This proves all assertions without a choice principle.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cha and Kim, Iterated satellite operators on the knot concordance group (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cochran, Orr and Teichner, Knot concordance, Whitney towers and L2-signatures (standard reference, not scraped)