Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Subgroup group-ring extension and fraction quotients

Statement

Let k be a commutative unital ring and H≤G a subgroup. Set A=k[H]⊆B=k[G]. Extension −⊗AB on right modules is exact and faithful, and for each right A-module M the map m↦m⊗1 is split injective as an A-module map. For every right-A chain complex C∗, without a boundedness or finiteness assumption, there is the natural isomorphism Hi(C∗)⊗AB≅Hi(C∗⊗AB). The corresponding left-module assertions hold with the tensor factors reversed.

Suppose additionally that A and B have 1≠0, no zero divisors and both Ore conditions, and are embedded in their right-fraction division rings F and K, respectively. Then the inclusion A→B extends uniquely to an injective ring map F→K. Under this identification, F∩B=A,F/A⟶K/B is injective as an A-bimodule map. All assertions require no choice principle, including when G/H is infinite. No splitting of a group extension is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group rings and, for the second clause only, the supplied Ore division rings. Group-ring elements are finite formal k-linear combinations of group elements.

[F1]

A tensor product is the group on pairs modulo additivity and balancing relations; every tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors. The tensor product M⊗RN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums

[F2]

The homology of a chain complex is its cycles modulo its boundaries. Homology object of a chain complex

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

For a finite set S of left cosets Hg, let BS be the subgroup of B consisting of sums supported on those cosets. It is a left A-submodule, and dropping all coefficients outside those cosets defines a left-A linear projection B→BS splitting inclusion. A finite choice of representatives g1,…,gr gives the explicit left-A isomorphism Ar→BS, (aj)↦∑jajgj: the supports of distinct summands are disjoint, and translating a supported sum by gj−1 proves surjectivity and uniqueness. Only representatives of this finite set of cosets are used; no global representative system is chosen. Every finite set of elements of B lies in some such BS, by taking the finitely many cosets that meet their supports.

1.2givenconstructalgebra

For the fraction clause, send as−1∈F, with a,s∈A and s≠0, to the same expression in K. If also as−1=bt−1 in F, choose a nonzero common right multiple su=tv=w in A. Multiplying on the right by w gives au=bv in A, and the same identity in K proves equality there. Thus the map is well-defined. At a common denominator the addition formula is (au+bv)w−1 in both division rings. For a product as−1bt−1 with b≠0, choose bv=su nonzero in A. Then s−1b=uv−1 and the product is au(tv)−1 in both rings; the case b=0 is immediate. Hence the map preserves multiplication, addition and unit. Its kernel is zero, since as−1=0 implies a=0 in K and hence in A. Uniqueness follows because a ring map extending A must send the inverse of each nonzero s∈A to its inverse in K.

2.1F1step 1.1constructalgebra

Let f:M′→M be injective. A tensor z∈M′⊗AB lies in the image of M′⊗ABS for a finite S, by [F1] and step 1.1. If (f⊗1)z=0, apply 1⊗(B→BS) to see that its representative zS maps to zero in M⊗ABS. The explicit finite-free coordinates of step 1.1 identify this map with a finite direct sum of copies of f, so zS=0 and z=0. For arbitrary maps L→fM→gN exact at M, the same finite projection sends a tensor in ker⁡(g⊗1) into a finite direct sum of copies of ker⁡g=im⁡f. Lifting its finitely many coordinates gives a tensor in the image of f⊗1. Conversely that image lies in the kernel since gf=0. A surjective map also remains surjective, by lifting the finitely many first coordinates of a tensor expression. Thus extension is exact for arbitrary right modules.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Dropping all coefficients outside H defines an A-bimodule map p:B→A with p(1)=1: multiplication by a group element of H on either side preserves both H and its complement. Balancing therefore defines ρM:M⊗AB→M, ρM(m⊗b)=mp(b). It is right-A linear and satisfies ρM(m⊗1)=m. This proves the split unit assertion. If f⊗1=0 for a module homomorphism f, then f(m)=ρN((f⊗1)(m⊗1))=0 for each m; the functor is faithful. Apply step 2.1 to the exact sequences defining cycles, boundaries and their quotient. It identifies tensor cycles with the kernel of the tensor differential, tensor boundaries with its image, and the tensor quotient with their quotient. The resulting map is [z]⊗b↦[z⊗b], proving the natural homology assertion degree by degree. Replacing left cosets by right cosets gives the same finite-coordinate proof for left modules, and the same coefficient projection splits their unit map.

4.1F1step 1.1step 1.2constructalgebra∎

Suppose q∈F∩B. Write q=as−1 with a,s∈A, s≠0, so qs=a. Partition the finite support of q into right cosets gH and choose finitely many representatives, using 1 for the coset H if it occurs. Thus q=∑jgjqj with qj∈A. Right multiplication by s preserves each of these coset supports. Since a is supported on H, every summand outside that coset satisfies gjqjs=0 as a group-ring element. The absence of zero divisors in B and s≠0 imply qj=0 for each such summand. Therefore q is supported on H, which means q∈A. The reverse inclusion is given, so F∩B=A. The map of additive quotients F/A→K/B is well-defined, has kernel (F∩B)/A=0, and respects both A actions because all inclusions are ring maps. Every representative, denominator, lift and coordinate set in this proof belongs to a single finite argument; no simultaneous infinite family is selected. This proves all assertions without a choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources