Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Probability laws on a compact metric space have weakly convergent subsequences

Statement

Assume AC. Every sequence of Borel probability laws on a compact metric K has a subsequence converging weakly to a Borel probability on K.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Countable uniformly dense tests on a compact metric space: Assume AC. For a compact metric K, C(K;R) has a countable uniformly dense subset in the supremum norm.

[F2]

Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: Every bounded sequence of reals has a convergent subsequence: if (xk) is a sequence of reals and there is MR with xkM for every kN (def-sequence), then there is a strictly increasing n:NN and a real L with xnjL.

Equivalently: the subsequential limit set of a bounded sequence is nonempty (def-subsequential-limit).

The theorem is the exact repair of the false claim that a bounded sequence converges. A bounded sequence need not converge, and the alternating sequence is the standing witness; what boundedness does force is that some subsequence converges. The converse of the theorem is false, and badly so: a sequence with a convergent subsequence need not be bounded.

[F3]

Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure: Let X be LCH and let Λ:Cc(X;R)R be positive. The Radon measure μ constructed above satisfies Λ(f)=Xfdμ(fCc(X;R)).

Proof

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

K cannot be empty because the given laws have mass one. List a countable dense test family f1,f2, by F1. Each numerical sequence fjdμn is bounded by fj. F2 supplies nested infinite subsequences along which the first j integrals converge. AC supplies these successive selections; taking the jth index of the jth subsequence gives one increasing diagonal subsequence nj with convergence for every listed test.

F1F2
1.2

For any continuous f and η>0 choose a listed test h with fh<η. The inequality fdμnjfdμnk2η+hdμnjhdμnk shows the f integrals are Cauchy. Define L(f) as their finite limit. Taking limits in finite linear combinations gives linearity; nonnegative f has nonnegative integrals and hence L(f)>=0; also L(1)=1.

givenalgebra
2.1

The compact metric space K is Hausdorff and locally compact (K itself is a compact neighborhood of each point), and Cc(K)=C(K). The positive functional in step 1.2 therefore satisfies F3. Its representing Borel measure has total mass L(1)=1. The defining identity L(f)=integral f against that measure, combined with step 1.2, is weak convergence of the extracted subsequence.

F3step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources