How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Probability laws on a compact metric space have weakly convergent subsequences
Statement
Assume AC. Every sequence of Borel probability laws on a compact metric K has a subsequence converging weakly to a Borel probability on K.
Facts & Assumptions
Countable uniformly dense tests on a compact metric space: Assume AC. For a compact metric K, has a countable uniformly dense subset in the supremum norm.
Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: Every bounded sequence of reals has a convergent subsequence: if is a sequence of reals and there is with for every (def-sequence), then there is a strictly increasing and a real with .
Equivalently: the subsequential limit set of a bounded sequence is nonempty (def-subsequential-limit).
The theorem is the exact repair of the false claim that a bounded sequence converges. A bounded sequence need not converge, and the alternating sequence is the standing witness; what boundedness does force is that some subsequence converges. The converse of the theorem is false, and badly so: a sequence with a convergent subsequence need not be bounded.
Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure: Let be LCH and let be positive. The Radon measure constructed above satisfies
Proof
Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.
K cannot be empty because the given laws have mass one. List a countable dense test family by F1. Each numerical sequence is bounded by . F2 supplies nested infinite subsequences along which the first j integrals converge. AC supplies these successive selections; taking the jth index of the jth subsequence gives one increasing diagonal subsequence with convergence for every listed test.
For any continuous f and >0 choose a listed test h with . The inequality shows the f integrals are Cauchy. Define L(f) as their finite limit. Taking limits in finite linear combinations gives linearity; nonnegative f has nonnegative integrals and hence L(f)>=0; also L(1)=1.
The compact metric space K is Hausdorff and locally compact (K itself is a compact neighborhood of each point), and . The positive functional in step 1.2 therefore satisfies F3. Its representing Borel measure has total mass L(1)=1. The defining identity L(f)=integral f against that measure, combined with step 1.2, is weak convergence of the extracted subsequence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- van Gaans, Proposition 5.3 and §6; diagonal replacement for compact-case functional argument (standard reference, not scraped)