Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If |delta_i| <= u and n u < 1, then prod (1+delta_i) = 1 + theta_n with |theta_n| <= gamma_n

Statement

Let n∈N with n≥1, let u≥0, let δ0,…,δn−1∈R satisfy ∣δi∣≤u for every i<n, and suppose nu<1. Then

∏i<n(1+δi)=1+θnwith∣θn∣≤γn:=nu1−nu.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number n≥1, a real u≥0 with nu<1, and reals δ0,…,δn−1 with ∣δi∣≤u; write γn:=nu/(1−nu).

[L1]

The hypothesis nu<1 gives u<1, hence 1−u>0 and 1+u>0; the unit roundoff vocabulary comes from The standard relative floating-point model and unit roundoff.

[L2]

Binomial expansion over the reals: (1+t)n=∑k≤n(nk)tk (The binomial theorem in R: (x+y)n=∑k<n+1ι ⁣(nk) xky n−k), and the binomial coefficient satisfies (nk)≤nk for every k≤n.

[L3]

Geometric series: for a real r with 0≤r<1, ∑k=0∞rk=1/(1−r) (For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

Since ∣δi∣≤u, each factor satisfies 1−u≤1+δi≤1+u, and the factors 1±u are nonnegative by [L1]; multiplying the inequalities across i<n gives (1−u)n≤∏i<n(1+δi)≤(1+u)n.

1.2L2algebra

Upper deviation. By [L2], (1+u)n−1=∑k=1n(nk)uk≤∑k=1nnkuk, since (nk)≤nk and u≥0.

2.1step 1.2L3algebra

The geometric series of [L3] at r=nu, where 0≤nu<1, gives ∑k=1∞(nu)k=nu/(1−nu)=γn, so step 1.2 gives (1+u)n−1≤γn.

3.1L2step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Lower deviation. By [L2], 1−(1−u)n=−∑k=1n(nk)(−u)k=∑k=1n(nk)(−1)k+1uk≤∑k=1n(nk)uk≤γn, the last estimate being step 1.2 and step 2.1; hence (1−u)n≥1−γn.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Define θn:=∏i<n(1+δi)−1. Step 1.1 gives (1−u)n−1≤θn≤(1+u)n−1, and steps 2.1 and 3.1 give (1−u)n−1≥−γn and (1+u)n−1≤γn, so −γn≤θn≤γn, that is ∣θn∣≤γn.

5.1step 4.1∎

Step 4.1 is exactly the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources