Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If |delta_i| <= u and n u < 1, then prod (1+delta_i) = 1 + theta_n with |theta_n| <= gamma_n

Statement

Let nN with n1, let u0, let δ0,,δn1R satisfy δiu for every i<n, and suppose nu<1. Then

i<n(1+δi)=1+θnwithθnγn:=nu1nu.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number n1, a real u0 with nu<1, and reals δ0,,δn1 with δiu; write γn:=nu/(1nu).

[L1]

The hypothesis nu<1 gives u<1, hence 1u>0 and 1+u>0; the unit roundoff vocabulary comes from The standard relative floating-point model and unit roundoff.

[L2]

Binomial expansion over the reals: (1+t)n=kn(nk)tk (The binomial theorem in R: (x+y)n=k<n+1ι ⁣(nk)xkynk), and the binomial coefficient satisfies (nk)nk for every kn.

[L3]

Geometric series: for a real r with 0r<1, k=0rk=1/(1r) (For r<1, k0rk=1/(1r), and for r1 the series diverges).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since δiu, each factor satisfies 1u1+δi1+u, and the factors 1±u are nonnegative by [L1]; multiplying the inequalities across i<n gives (1u)ni<n(1+δi)(1+u)n.

L1algebra
1.2

Upper deviation. By [L2], (1+u)n1=k=1n(nk)ukk=1nnkuk, since (nk)nk and u0.

L2algebra
2.1

The geometric series of [L3] at r=nu, where 0nu<1, gives k=1(nu)k=nu/(1nu)=γn, so step 1.2 gives (1+u)n1γn.

step 1.2L3algebra
3.1

Lower deviation. By [L2], 1(1u)n=k=1n(nk)(u)k=k=1n(nk)(1)k+1ukk=1n(nk)ukγn, the last estimate being step 1.2 and step 2.1; hence (1u)n1γn.

L2step 1.2step 2.1algebra
4.1

Define θn:=i<n(1+δi)1. Step 1.1 gives (1u)n1θn(1+u)n1, and steps 2.1 and 3.1 give (1u)n1γn and (1+u)n1γn, so γnθnγn, that is θnγn.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Step 4.1 is exactly the claim.

step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources