Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Proper subgroup of a finite p group is properly normalized local

Statement

Let P be a finite p-group and let S<P be a proper subgroup. Then S<NP(S): the normalizer of S in P strictly contains S.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A prime p, a finite p-group P, and a proper subgroup S<P; the assertion is proved for all finite p-groups of order <∣P∣ (induction hypothesis).

[F1]

S<NP(S) means that NP(S) is a subgroup of P containing S properly, i.e. that there is x∈P with xSx−1=S and x∉S (The normalizer NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} of a subgroup, Subgroup).

[F2]

Every subgroup of P is a finite p-group, so ∣S∣ is a power of p; if P≠1 then ∣P∣=pr with r≥1; S=P if and only if ∣S∣=∣P∣ (Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p, A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some n∈N, Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F3]

If P≠1 then Z(P)≠1; Z(P)⊴P; and Z(P) consists of the elements commuting with every element of P, so zSz−1=S for every z∈Z(P) (Every nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial center, in fact p divides ∣Z(P)∣, The center Z(G) of a group, The center of a group is a normal subgroup, Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation, Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

[F5]

For Z⊴P and S≤P the image SZ/Z is a subgroup of P/Z, and if Z≤S then SZ/Z=S/Z with ∣S/Z∣=∣S∣/∣Z∣; moreover conjugation x↦uxu−1 is an automorphism, so ∣xSx−1∣=∣S∣ and xSx−1Z is the image of xSx−1 in P/Z (The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup, Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism, If H≤G and N⊴G, then HN is a subgroup and H∩N⊴H, If [G:N] is finite then ∣G/N∣=[G:N]; for finite G this equals ∣G∣/∣N∣, Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

[F6]

Strong induction on the natural number ∣P∣: if, for every N, truth for all finite p-groups of order <N implies truth for all of order N, then the statement holds for all finite p-groups (Strong (complete) induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The case P=1 is vacuous, since it has no proper subgroup. Assume the assertion known for every finite p-group of order <∣P∣.

F2F6given
1.2

If S=1 then every x∈P satisfies xSx−1=S, so NP(S)=P; if also S<P then P≠1 and NP(S)=P>S, which is the claim.

F1F3given
1.3

Suppose Z(P)⊈S: choose z∈Z(P) with z∉S. By [F3] z normalizes S, so z∈NP(S)∖S and S<NP(S).

F1F3choose
1.4

It remains to treat the case Z≤S with Z:=Z(P), under S≠1 and P≠1. Then P/Z is a finite p-group of order ∣P∣/∣Z∣<∣P∣ by [F3] and [F4], and T:=S/Z is a subgroup of it by [F5]. If T=P/Z then S=P by [F5], contrary to hypothesis, so T<P/Z.

F2F3F4F5given
2.1

The induction hypothesis of step 1.1 applies to the finite p-group P/Z and its proper subgroup T: there is a coset xZ∈NP/Z(T) with xZ∉T. By the definition of the normalizer this means (xZ)T(xZ)−1=T in P/Z.

F1F4F5step 1.4assume-hyp
3.1

Translating back: (xSx−1)Z/Z=SZ/Z. Since Z≤S, this says xSx−1Z=S, so every element of xSx−1 lies in S; thus xSx−1⊆S, and since conjugation is injective with ∣xSx−1∣=∣S∣, actually xSx−1=S. Hence x∈NP(S) by [F1].

F5step 2.1algebra
3.2

Moreover x∉S: otherwise xZ∈S/Z=T, contrary to the choice in step 2.1.

F5step 2.1
4.1

So in the case Z(P)≤S there is x∈NP(S)∖S as well, and together with steps 1.2 and 1.3 this proves S<NP(S) in every case, completing the induction. ∎

F1step 1.2step 1.3step 3.1step 3.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources