Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The proximal map of the l1 norm is soft thresholding

Statement

For n≥1 and λ>0, the function gλ(u)=λ∥u∥1 is proper, closed and convex in the convention of Proper closed convex extended-real functions on Rn. For every t>0 and v∈Rn, prox⁡tλ∥⋅∥1(v)=(Stλ(vk))k<n, where Sτ is the soft-thresholding map of Soft-thresholding map.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1, λ,t>0, and v∈Rn.

[F1]

The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞: ∥u∥1=∑k<n∣uk∣ and ∥u−v∥22=∑k<n(uk−vk)2.

[F2]

Proximal mapping: the proximal point minimizes λ∥u∥1+∥u−v∥22/(2t) over u∈Rn.

[F3]

Soft-thresholding map: Sτ(s)=s−τ if s>τ, 0 if ∣s∣≤τ, and s+τ if s<−τ.

[F6]

Proper closed convex extended-real functions on Rn: properness is nonempty effective domain, convexity is the Jensen inequality, and closedness means closed epigraph.

Proof

1.1F1F4F5F6givenchoosealgebra

Set h(u)=λ∥u∥1. It is finite everywhere and h(0)=0, so its effective domain is nonempty. By [F4] and λ>0, the norm triangle and homogeneity inequalities give h((1−θ)u+θw)≤(1−θ)h(u)+θh(w)(0≤θ≤1), so h is convex. It is continuous by [F5]. To see its epigraph is closed, take any (u,s) with s<h(u), set ε=(h(u)−s)/3, and choose δ0>0 so ∥u′−u∥2<δ0 implies ∣h(u′)−h(u)∣<ε. If ∥(u′−u,s′−s)∥2<min⁡{δ0,ε} in Rn+1, then s′<s+ε<h(u)−ε<h(u′), so this neighborhood misses the epigraph. Thus the complement is open and the epigraph is closed. By [F6], h is proper, closed and convex, as required by the proximal definition.

1.2F3givenalgebra

Fix a scalar s=vk. On u≥0, completing the square shows the minimum is at u=max⁡{s−tλ,0}; on u≤0 it is at u=min⁡{s+tλ,0}. If s>tλ, the first candidate is s−tλ>0 and has value strictly below the common boundary value at 0, while the second candidate is 0. If s<−tλ, the symmetric argument gives the unique minimizer s+tλ<0. If −tλ≤s≤tλ, both half-line minima are 0. Thus the unique scalar minimizer is Stλ(s) in all three cases.

2.1F1F2step 1.1givenalgebra

By [F1], the objective in [F2] is the finite sum ∑k<nϕk(uk), where ϕk(uk)=λ∣uk∣+(uk−vk)2/(2t). It is enough to find the unique minimizer of each scalar function: the sum is minimized exactly when every coordinate is at its scalar minimum, and the positive quadratic term makes each scalar function strictly convex.

3.1F2step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Applying step 1.2 to each of the finitely many coordinates k<n gives the unique vector minimizer (Stλ(vk))k<n, which is the proximal point by [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources