How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Capped randomized amplitude amplification preserves a flagged output
Statement
Let be a supplied finite-dimensional unitary preparation, a supplied success projector, and the declared initial vector. For every unit vector on the sampler register, supply a two-outcome flag-only measurement instrument: its good outcome has probability and returns the normalized branch when nonzero; its bad outcome returns the normalized branch when nonzero. It leaves every score, label, and work register unmeasured, and its implementation and cost are declared. Let , where is a supplied positive rational, and let be a supplied rational failure target. A Grover iteration is , where , using the supplied exact reflections.
Set and let be the least positive integer for which the exact rational comparison holds. These choices are finite: is found by integer squaring comparisons, and repeated multiplication by terminates because its powers tend to zero. If , take at most fresh preparations and apply the flag-only instrument to each, returning the first good branch or FAIL. Otherwise set ; in each of at most rounds, prepare and measure only the flag. Return its good branch if present. After a bad outcome, draw fair bits to obtain uniformly in . If , prepare a fresh , apply Grover iterations, and measure only the flag; return its good branch if present. The events and a failed amplified flag count as a failed round. Return FAIL only after the cap. This procedure returns the normalized good projection up to global phase with probability at least . Its preparation, inverse, reflection, verifier, random-bit, and output costs are charged; the calls to and reflections are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The declared preparation and exact reflections, the flag-only measurement instrument in the Statement, and the exact finite random bits and rational cap comparisons.
Controlled Unitary Access: controlled uses of a supplied finite unitary are separately declared access operations.
Inverse Unitary Access: the inverse preparation is the adjoint circuit and its calls are separately charged.
Finite projective measurements: projective-measurement outcome weights are given by the Born rule; the flag-only branch update used here is an explicit supplied instrument in the Statement.
Projector Reflections Are Hermitian Unitary Involutions: projector reflections are self-adjoint unitary involutions.
The exponential function is strictly increasing: the real exponential is strictly increasing.
The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function: is the inverse of the positive real exponential.
, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: the real exponential satisfies .
Proof
If , the direct flag outcome is good. If , put , , , and , so and . The orthonormal vectors and give . In this ordered basis the reflection about is and , so one Grover iteration has matrix . It multiplies the complex coordinate by , hence after iterations the good amplitude is .
If , then and minimality of gives . Conditional on , the draw is uniform on . For , and the finite geometric sum of give Here and , so and the conditional mean success exceeds . Multiplication by gives randomized-branch success at least . For the direct flag succeeds with probability greater than .
If , the direct-then-randomized round succeeds with probability at least by step 2.1; if or , its direct flag succeeds with probability at least . Independent fresh rounds therefore fail altogether with probability at most by the exact cap test. The comparison loop terminates because by the binomial theorem, so . If , minimality gives ; applying the increasing logarithm and using , with , gives . The same asymptotic bound holds for , so . Since , the stated call bound follows.
Every successful branch is passed through the supplied flag-only instrument, so its returned state is the normalized good projection of that branch's input and no score, label, or work register is measured. Step 1.1 shows that each amplified good component is a scalar multiple of ; direct success has the same good ray. Thus every successful return is up to global phase. Each round uses at most Grover iterations, one direct preparation, at most one amplified preparation, and random bits; multiplying by proves the stated call and random-bit bounds, with each controlled, inverse, reflection, verifier, and output cost charged.
Depends on
- Controlled Unitary Access
- Inverse Unitary Access
- Finite projective measurements
- Orthogonal-Projector Reflection and Access Contract
- Projector Reflections Are Hermitian Unitary Involutions
- The exponential function is strictly increasing
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- $\exp(z+w)=\exp z\,\exp w$, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brassard, Høyer, Mosca, and Tapp, Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)