Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inverse Unitary Access

Definition

For a finite-dimensional unitary U, inverse access is the explicitly granted operation U†=U−1. Its availability and query or gate charge are recorded separately from forward access, including any controlled access in Controlled Unitary Access. For a chronological sequence of length k≥0 that applies U1 first and Uk last, the total operator is W=Uk⋯U1 when k>0 and W=IH when k=0. For k>0, the inverse sequence applies Uk† first, then Uk−1†, down to U1†; for k=0 it is the empty sequence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Finite-dimensional unitaries U1,…,Uk and an explicit access model for the operations named in the Definition.

[L1]

Controlled Unitary Access fixes the target unitary whose forward and controlled capabilities are explicitly declared. Its carrier is present in this batch.

[F1]

For an endomorphism in finite dimension, preserving lengths, preserving inner products, carrying orthonormal bases to orthonormal bases, and T∗T=I are equivalent: for a finite-dimensional endomorphism, preserving norms implies U∗U=UU∗=I and U−1=U∗.

[F3]

The adjoint T∗:W→V is characterised by ⟨Tv,w⟩W=⟨v,T∗w⟩V: the adjoint is characterized by ⟨Tv,w⟩=⟨v,T∗w⟩.

Verification

1.1givenL1F1F3

Each Uj is an invertible isometry by the unitary convention in [L1] and [F1]. Thus its adjoint exists in finite dimension and is its inverse, so the inverse call specified in the Definition has the stated mathematical meaning.

1.2givenF2algebra

For k>0, repeated application of [F2] gives (Uk⋯U1)∗=U1∗⋯Uk∗. Acting on a vector from right to left, this applies Uk∗ first and U1∗ last, exactly reversing the original chronology.

1.3givenalgebra

For k=0, the specified total map is IH and its inverse is also IH; there are no calls or operations in either sequence. This covers the empty-sequence endpoint without interpreting an undefined product.

2.1L1step 1.2∎

The matrix identity determines the inverse map but says nothing about whether the access model grants or charges its calls. The Definition therefore records inverse availability and cost explicitly instead of inferring either from forward access.

Depends on

Used by

…and 20 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources