How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Controlled Phase Rotation
Definition
For a real angle , define the one-qubit phase matrix . In control-first order define
in the ordered basis . This is the exact controlled phase; no circuit cost or controlled access to an arbitrary black-box unitary is implied.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real , an ordered control-target qubit pair, and the exact phase convention of the Definition.
Controlled Unitary Access defines the control-first block action . Its carrier is present in this batch.
Exact one-qubit gates and rotations defines the exact exponential and computational basis. Its current draft definition body was read; its item is now present in the QC07 manifest and page; the page remains draft.
Pauli formula for an axis rotation proves by the convergent Pauli exponential series. Its current draft proof was read; its item is now present in the QC07 manifest and page; the page remains draft.
The computational basis is orthonormal proves the ordered computational basis of is orthonormal; this supplier is in the dependency closure through [L3].
, , and : for real , and .
, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: for complex .
Verification
The target computational basis is orthonormal by [L4], and [F1] gives modulus one for both diagonal entries of . Thus is an invertible isometry and hence unitary, so [L1] applies to its controlled block. The first control block applies the identity, so and are fixed. In the second block, fixes and sends to . These four actions give the diagonal matrix in the Definition.
Every diagonal entry of has modulus one by [F1]; its conjugate transpose is therefore its inverse, so it is unitary.
By [L3], . By [F2], multiplying it by gives . Therefore , which is the block phase applied after . Dropping that control phase would change the defined operation.
Depends on
Used by
- Controlled-Z and SWAP Definition
- Finite open-graph adaptive measurement pattern Definition
- Graph state of an ordered finite simple graph Definition
- Normalized transport schedule for a J/CZ circuit Definition
- QAOA circuit and expected combinatorial objective Definition
- QFT ideal and finite-set gate-cost models Definition
- Binary factorization of QFT basis output Lemma
- Computational-basis amplitudes of a graph state Lemma
- Controlled-Z edge gates commute Lemma
- Controlled-Z matching action on a Pauli frame Lemma
- Four-branch open-graph pattern for CZ Lemma
- Graph-state stabilizer generators Lemma
- One-bit J-gate teleportation branch identity Lemma
- Circuit and pattern translations are branch preserving and universal Theorem
- Controlled-Phase Approximation and Global-Phase Boundary Theorem
- Finite universal-gate compilation cost for the truncated QFT Theorem
- Graph state is the unique joint stabilizer ray Theorem
- Pattern branch probabilities and zero-probability transcripts Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, arXiv:1907.09415v6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Computation, Chapter 6: Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)