How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quantum query algorithm
Definition
For each encoded instance length and explicitly declared public data , a quantum query algorithm is a specified finite circuit protocol on its query and work registers, fixed independently of the hidden instance at fixed . The hidden encoding labels the oracle instance; it is not supplied as a readable input register. A register is a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space with its ordered computational basis; an -qubit register uses the lexicographic bit-string basis, with the first wire most significant (Finite registers and their ordered computational bases). The finite promise-computation model Finite quantum promise-computation model supplies the public-classical-input, zero-initialized ancillary-register, ordered-output-tuple, and final-predicate conventions. Its classical input and terminal predicate receive only the declared public data, not the hidden encoding. Circuit syntax fixes the ordered wires and finite gate list Finite circuit syntax and ordered wire labels, and its denotation fixes the chronological gate composition Denotational semantics of a finite layered circuit. The execution tree starts in the standard public-input basis state with all other registers zero. Any explicit preparation interface is executed as a specified finite prefix of unitary or instrument nodes of this tree, with its preparation calls and other resource costs charged under the declared access contract. Intermediate measurements and classical feed-forward are represented by finite trees of instrument outcomes and branch-specific unitary operations. In the ordinary oracle-only model, all preparation operations, nonoracle gates and instruments, branch-control rules, and terminal output rules are independent of the hidden instance at fixed ; later operations may depend on observed outcomes. For each instantiated oracle, Normalized output law for finite quantum query branches gives the normalized output law of this tree with its public classical input. The output is interpreted according to the decision bit or search relation in QA task and promise domain.
In the ordinary oracle-only model, hidden-instance dependence enters only through the designated oracle calls. Explicit public parameters and arithmetic inputs remain available when the task declares them. Any additional instance-dependent state preparation or data-access operation is a separately declared and charged resource. Oracle-only lower bounds compare instances with the same public data and without such additional input access; the hidden encoding itself supplies none.
A -query algorithm has at most designated calls to the oracle of Promise query instance and oracle family and Coherent XOR function oracle on every execution branch for every promised . Calls count once each; gates in the circuit outside those designated calls are not query calls. Uniformity is asserted only when the family satisfies Full-list uniform quantum circuit family. A controlled call has the block action in Controlled Unitary Access and is available only when the access contract explicitly supplies and charges it. An inverse call to this XOR oracle has the same action as an ordinary call by A total Boolean XOR oracle is unitary and involutive; inverses of other unitaries use the separate availability and charge convention in Inverse Unitary Access.
Remarks
The finite promise-computation model supplies the public-input and terminal-output conventions. The finite instrument tree extends it to intermediate measurements; its branch law is applied separately to each instantiated oracle, without granting the terminal predicate access to the hidden encoding. No uniformity claim is made unless the full-list condition is supplied.
Depends on
- Promise query instance and oracle family
- QA task and promise domain
- Normalized output law for finite quantum query branches
- Finite registers and their ordered computational bases
- Finite quantum promise-computation model
- Finite circuit syntax and ordered wire labels
- Denotational semantics of a finite layered circuit
- Coherent XOR function oracle
- Full-list uniform quantum circuit family
- Controlled Unitary Access
- Inverse Unitary Access
- A total Boolean XOR oracle is unitary and involutive
Used by
- Amplitude amplification with a fixed integer iteration count Algorithm
- Amplitude amplification with independently chosen phase rotations Algorithm
- BBHT search when the marked count is unknown Algorithm
- Bounded-error evaluation from a dual adversary certificate Algorithm
- Controlled input-consistency reflection from a bit query Algorithm
- Exact success amplification by attenuating the good branch Algorithm
- Iterative no-QFT amplitude estimation by finite-grid likelihood Algorithm
- Known-amplitude amplification with integer rounding Algorithm
- Known-count Grover search by exact integer maximization Algorithm
- Known-count search by randomized Grover iteration Algorithm
- Median confidence amplification for amplitude estimation Algorithm
- One Grover iterate in the standard bit-query model Algorithm
- One-query Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm Algorithm
- One-query Deutsch algorithm Algorithm
- One-query Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm Algorithm
- Unknown-amplitude randomized search Algorithm
- Variance-aware quantum Monte Carlo Algorithm
- Amplitude estimation and counting input/output contract Definition
- Boolean oracle query model for search lower bounds Definition
- Exact correctness for promise tasks Definition
- Nonoracle quantum gate cost Definition
- Quantum query complexity Definition
- Worst-case bounded-error correctness Definition
- Promise, query and cost-model examples Example
- Adversary progress at initial and bounded-error final states Lemma
- Coherent normal form for finite quantum query algorithms Lemma
- Dyadic positive-mean estimator under an L2 bound Lemma
- One oracle call changes adversary progress by at most filtered spectral norm Lemma
- Unitary normal form for finite bit-query algorithms without extra queries Lemma
- Dual reflection evaluator has bounded-error correctness Theorem
- Exact query count for the finite-grid iterative estimator Theorem
- Expected cost of unknown-amplitude search Theorem
- Explicit median confidence guarantee for amplitude estimation Theorem
- Promise-preserving reduction composes with a query solver Theorem
- Quantum bounded-expectation guarantee and query cost Theorem
- The controlled input-consistency circuit realizes the exact reflection Theorem
- Variance-aware quantum Monte Carlo guarantee Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Information, Chapter 6: Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)