Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Known-amplitude amplification with integer rounding

Definition

Input a coherent sampler with an exactly represented known success weight a∈[0,1]. For the finite rational-input procedure, a is given as a binary rational; exact algebraic inputs are also allowed when the supplied representation supports exact comparisons. If a=0, return fail without normalizing a good component. If a=1, prepare A∣0⟩, apply the declared good/bad projective instrument, and return its good conditional state (or, in the diagonal classical-output specialization, measure and verify the output).

For 0<a<1, set θ:=arcsin⁡a∈(0,π/2), using the principal inverse-sine and nonnegative-square-root conventions of Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine and Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}. Then θ is the unique angle with sin⁡2θ=a. Set K:=⌈1/a⌉, equivalently the least positive integer K with K2a≥1. For each integer k=0,…,K, compute pk=sin⁡2((2k+1)θ) exactly by the rational recurrence x0=1,x1=1−2a,xn+1=2(1−2a)xn−xn−1 (n≥1),pk=(1−x2k+1)/2. Indeed, writing xn=cos⁡(2nθ), double-angle gives x0=1, x1=cos⁡(2θ)=1−2a, and cosine addition gives the displayed recurrence. Also sin⁡2((2k+1)θ)=(1−cos⁡((4k+2)θ))/2=(1−x2k+1)/2. Choose the least k attaining the maximum of this finite list. Run the fixed-k procedure Amplitude amplification with a fixed integer iteration count, verify when a classical candidate is requested, and return the good conditional output or fail. For rational a, every xn and pk is rational, so the comparisons are exact. No time bound for this classical preprocessing is claimed.

Remarks

For a general real a, the same mathematical maximizer is defined, but a finite implementation requires an exact representation and a procedure that decides all finitely many comparisons, including ties. The item makes no computation claim for an arbitrary unrepresented real.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources