Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Denotational semantics of a finite layered circuit

Definition

For a gate occurrence g=(γ,w) in a circuit on Qn, let U~g be the global embedding from A local gate has a unique global wire embedding. For a layer Lt=(g1,…,gs), define ULt:=U~gs⋯U~g1. For a circuit with chronological layers L1,…,Ld, define UC:=ULd⋯UL1. The empty circuit and every empty layer denote the identity on Qn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite layered circuit on the ordered register Qn.

[F1]

Finite circuit syntax and ordered wire labels: layers are finite ordered lists of gates with pairwise disjoint supports, and L1 is applied first.

[F2]

A local gate has a unique global wire embedding: each gate occurrence has a unique unitary action on the full register.

[F3]

Gates on disjoint wires commute: the embeddings of gates in the same layer commute.

[F4]

Orthogonal and unitary operators form groups, and their determinants have modulus one: finite products and inverses of unitary operators are unitary.

Proof

1.1givenF2F4algebra

Every factor U~gj in a layer product is unitary by [F2]; the empty product is identity. The layer map ULt is therefore unitary by [F4].

1.2givenF1F3algebra

Since every pair of gates in a layer has disjoint support, [F3] shows the factors commute pairwise. Any two enumerations of a finite list are related by finitely many adjacent swaps, so the layer product is independent of the enumeration.

2.1givenF1F4algebra∎

The chronological application of L1,…,Ld composes the last-applied map on the left, hence is ULd⋯UL1. It is unitary as a finite product of unitary maps; when d=0 this is the identity.

Depends on

Used by

…and 65 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources