How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
LCU block-encoding construction
Definition
Inputs. Integers and , a finite family of square matrices , positive numbers , and exact block-encoding unitaries . Also supply coefficients after omitting zero coefficients, with . The component circuits and their controlled access are separate access inputs.
Instructions. Let . Extend each component unitary to the common ordered ancilla register by identities on its unused ancillas, so its all-zero block is unchanged. Let , , and provide a unitary on the -qubit coefficient register satisfying
The squared amplitudes sum to one by the definition of . Define the unitary
where each acts on its padded component ancilla and the data register; an empty second sum is zero. Return , acting on the coefficient register, common component ancillas, and data system.
The instance must supply or compile , , and SELECT, and state the cost of each separately. A coefficient table is not itself a state-preparation circuit; table access, synthesis, controlled component calls, phases, precision, and classical preprocessing are charged under Block-encoding oracle and implementation cost model.
If is synthesized from the explicit exact normalized amplitude table , where for and for , the exact-table procedure QC24 State Preparation is an optional construction. Since zero coefficients were omitted and each , and the first nonzero amplitude is positive real. The state-preparation procedure omits only this reference phase, which is here, so the prepared vector equals exactly. Under its ideal continuous-angle model, QC24 State Preparation Rotation Level Upper Bound gives at most prefix rotations, at most phases, bounded-arity gates and serial depth, and at most reusable clean work bits. Supply or compile the inverse circuit separately and charge it separately. If the table uses exactly bits for each real and imaginary coordinate, QC24 Explicit State-Preparation Cost Guarantee separately charges its input bits and full-table preprocessing scan. These suppliers assert no finite-alphabet arbitrary-angle implementation or Turing bit-time bound; a supplied circuit for instead carries its own declared costs.
Remarks
The current XOR-valued interface Coherent XOR function oracle does not itself implement this unitary-valued SELECT; if SELECT is assembled from component calls, its separate controlled-call and phase construction must be supplied and costed.
The projected block and normalization of the returned unitary are proved in LCU projected-block correctness.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite CKS sparse QLSP with variable-time inverse estimation Algorithm
- QSVT implementation of a bounded matrix function Algorithm
- Sparse-oracle Gibbs-state purification Algorithm
- A bounded polynomial approximation to a scaled exponential Example
- Two-term LCU normalization and access count Example
- Block-encoding normalization, error, and cost accounting Theorem
- LCU projected-block correctness Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, Chapter 28 §28.3 (17 April 2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- András Gilyén, Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low, and Nathan Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond, Lemma 52 (standard reference, not scraped)